Development of China’s Court Informatization in 2016 and Prospect for 2017

  Ⅰ.Convenient Service

   ⅰ.Serving concerned parties in lawsuit

   ⅱ.Serving lawyers in case handling

   ⅲ.Serving the public

  Ⅱ.Intelligent Trial

   ⅰ.Intelligent push of judicial resources

   ⅱ.Risk warning of trial deviation

   ⅲ.Intelligent generation of legal documents

  Ⅲ.Efficient Enforcement

   ⅰ.Online investigation and control makes enforcement faster and more efficient

   ⅱ.Node management sets standards for enforcement

   ⅲ.Joint punishment adds deterrence to enforcement

  Ⅳ.Scientific Management

   ⅰ.Optimizing and reshaping judicial enforcement process

   ⅱ.Timely supervising the quality and efficiency of judicial enforcement

   ⅲ.Accurately summarizing performance of court statf

  Ⅴ.Normalized Disclosure

   ⅰ.Open process makes trials transparent

   ⅱ.Live streaming of court trial realizes “seeing is believing”

   ⅲ.China discloses most judgement documents in the world

   ⅳ.A long way to go in disclosure of enforcement information

  Ⅵ.Accurate Decision

   ⅰ.Establishing judicial big data

   ⅱ.Serving decision making with deep data mining

  Ⅶ.Prospect for 2017

   ⅰ.Making work arrangements in a holistic way and avoiding conflicts

   ⅱ.Filling legal gaps and providing legal basis

   ⅲ.Fostering Internet thinking and awareness

   ⅳ.Realizing balanced development by promoting cloud technology

   ⅴ.Integrating judicial work with technology and forming synergy

   ⅵ.Strengthening judicial transparency and preserving judicial justice

   ⅶ.Stressing cyber security and ensuring independence and controllability

   ⅷ.Achieving full coverage and elaborate services

  Conclusion

  Appendix: Indicator System for Third Party Evaluation of Court Informatization

   1.Serving judges (30%)

   2.Serving concerned parties and lawyers (40%)

   3.Serving the public (30%)

 Development and Trend of Trial Management Informatization

  Ⅰ.Significance of Trial Management Informatization

  Ⅱ.Practices of Trial Management Informatization

   ⅰ.Open Access to Trial Management Data

   ⅱ.Making Trial Services More Convenient

    1.Judicial Documentation Assistance System

    2.Electronic Service System

    3.Speech Recognition System for Court Trials

    4.Case Handling Assistance System

   ⅲ.Strengthening Control on Key Nodes of the Trial Process

  Ⅲ.Achievements of Trial Management Informatization

   ⅰ.Improved Quality and Efficiency of Trials

   ⅱ.More intelligent Trial Management

   ⅲ.More Scientific Trial Management

   ⅳ.More Refined Trial Management Information

  Ⅳ.Working Direction of Trial Management Informatization

   ⅰ.Promoting the Extension from Trial Management to Trial Services

   ⅱ.Building and Improving Trial Management Platforms of Full Coverage

   ⅲ.Expanding and Deepening the Use of Trial Management Information

   ⅳ.Enhancing Information Sharing and Compatibility among Courts

   ⅴ.Promoting Well-balanced Development of Trial Management Informatization

 Informatization Boosts Judicial Transparency

  Ⅰ.Trial-related Information: From Announcement on Wall to Disclosure Online

   ⅰ.Comprehensive Disclosure of General Court Information

   ⅱ.Publicizing Staff Information No Longer as a Sensitive Issue

   ⅲ.Disclosing Financial Information Becomes Normal

   ⅳ.Make Litigation Guidance Public Vividly and Visually

  Ⅱ.Court Judgements: From Service to Interested Parties to Public Sharing

   ⅰ.Early Efforts to Publish Judgements Online

   ⅱ.Institutionalization of Publishing Judgements Online

   ⅲ.Intensification of Publishing Judgements

   ⅳ.Facilitating Access to Judgements

  Ⅲ.Process Information: From Being Nowhere to Inquire to Voluntary Push

   ⅰ.Online Inquiry about Progress in Legal Cases

   ⅱ.Voluntary Real-time Push of Process Information

  Ⅳ.Court Trial: From Open On-site to Long-distance Visual

   ⅰ.Broadcasting Trials Live as Normal

   ⅱ.Diverse Forms of Broadcasting Trials Live

  Ⅴ.Enforcement Information: From Partial Disclosure to Total Transparency

  Ⅵ.Judicial Transparency: Dilemma and Way Out

   ⅰ.Integration of Judicial Disclosure Platforms

   ⅱ.Zero Cost for Court Announcement

   ⅲ.Sharing of Judicial Data

 Informatization Helps Courts “Basically Address Difficulty in Judgement Enforcement”

  Ⅰ.Background: Setting the Objective of “Basically Addressing Difficulty in Judgement Enforcement

  Ⅱ.Achievement: Deep Integration with Court Enforcement

   ⅰ.Creating an Enforcement “Highway”

    1.Covering All Types of Property

    2.Integrating Investigation and Control Functions

    3.Having Clues to Follow in Search of People Online

    4.Automation Facilitates Inquiry

   ⅱ.Regulating the Operation of Enforcement Power

    1.Standardization of the Enforcement Process

    2.Visualization of On-the-spot Enforcement

    3.Systematic Enforcement-closing Management

    4.Transparency in the Process of Enforcement

    5.Online Judicial Auction

   ⅲ.Stepping up Joint Punishment against Dishonesty

    1.Default Exposure across the Board

    2.Joint Credit Punishment

  Ⅲ.Urgent Need for Greater Information Concentration

   ⅰ.Non-unity of Platforms

    1.Dispersion of Information Platforms

    2.Diversity of Credit Platforms

   ⅱ.Inadequacy of Functions

    1.Announcement Incompleteness

    2.Lack of Detailed Classification

   ⅲ.Inadequacy of Data Interconnection

  Ⅳ.Looking Forward: Deep Mining of Enforcement Big Data

 The Development, Application and Prospect of Judicial Big Data

  Ⅰ.Introduction

  Ⅱ.Building of Judicial Big Data

   ⅰ.Building a Data Platform, Gathering Data and Information

   ⅱ.Upgrading Information Systems, Achieving Data Integration

   ⅲ.Optimizing Judicial Statistics, Stepping Up Data Analysis

  Ⅲ.Application of Judicial Big Data

   ⅰ.Providing Assistance for Judgement Enforcement

   ⅱ.Providing Basis for Judicial Management

   ⅲ.Providing Support for Policy-making

  Ⅳ.Looking Forward: More Efforts Need Be Made to Boost Big Data Application

   ⅰ.Step up Judicial Big Data Integration

   ⅱ.Deepen the Application of Judicial Big Data

   ⅲ.Improve the Accuracy of Judicial Data

   ⅳ.Step up Big Data Security

 Memorabilia of China Court Informatization 2016

  January

  February

  March

  April

  May

  July

  August

  September

  October

  November

  December