篇章数

2

引证文献

0 !

参考文献

60

区域(2015年 总第4辑)图书

Remapping Vol.4

SSAPID:101-7911-3799-18
ISBN:978-7-5097-7688-9
DOI:
ISSN:

[内容简介] 《区域》由清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所主办,为跨学科和跨文化的人文研究丛书,其宗旨是立足人文学科的具体问题,在跨学科和跨文化视野中探讨中国人文学科的新领域、新途径和新方法,力图在长期学术积累的基础上,形成新的学术范式。本辑包括本尼迪克特·安德森和安东尼奥·奈格里在清华大学的系列演讲,以及围绕法国经济学家皮凯蒂《21世纪资本论》的辩论、实验主义治理等论题的论文。

相关信息

丛书名:
编 辑:袁卫华
出版社:社会科学文献出版社
出版时间: 2016年06月
语 种:中文
中图分类:B1 世界哲学

Banerjee,Abhijit and Newman,Andrew. (2003). “Inequality,Growth and Trade Policy,” MIT Working Paper.

Banerjee,Abhijit and Piketty,Thomas. (2004). “Top Indian Incomes,1922-2000,” CEPR Working Paper 4632.

Banerjee,Abhijit and Piketty,Thomas. (2005). “Top Indian Incomes,1922-2000,” World Bank Economic Review,19:1-20.

Chen,Shaohua and Wang,Yan. (2001). “China’s Growth and Poverty Reduction:Recent Trends between 1990 and 1999,” World Bank Working Paper.

Deaton,Angus. (2003). “Adjusted Indian Poverty Estimates for 1999-2000,” Economic and Political Weekly,January 25th.

Kremer,Michael and Maskin,Eric. (2003). “Globalization and Inequality,” Harvard Working Paper.

Piketty,Thomas. (2003. “Income Inequality in France,1901-1998,” Journal of Political Economy,111:1004-1042.

Piketty,Thomas and Qian,Nancy. (2006). “Income Inequality and Progressive Income Taxation in China and Indi. (1986-2015),” CEPR Discussion Paper 5703.

Piketty,Thomas and Saez,Emmanuel. (2003). “Income Inequality in the United States,1913-1998,” Quarterly Journal of Economics,118:1-39.

Ravallion,Martin and Chen,Shaohua. (2003). “When Economic Reform is Faster than Statistical Reform:Measuring and Explaining Income Inequality in Rural China,” World Bank Working Paper.

Tendulkar,Suresh. (2003). “Organized Labour Market in India—Pre and Post Reform,” Delhi School of Economics Working Paper.

Wei,Shangjin and Wu,Yi. (2001). “Globalization and Inequality:Evidence from Within China,” NBER Working Paper 8611.

[1]Andronov,A. A. and Chaikin,C. E. Theory of Oscillations(Princeton,1949).

[2]Coddington,E. A. and Levinson,H. Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations(New York,1955).

[3]Inada,K. “On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth:Comments and a Generalization,” Review of Economic Studies(1963),119-127.

[4]Meade,J. E. “The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy,” Economic Journal(1963),368-374.

[5]Minorsky,N. Nonlinear Oscillations(Princeton,1962).

[6]Pasinetti,L. L. “Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies(1962),267-279.

[7]Samuelson,P. A. and Modigliani,F. “The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models,” Review of Economic Studies(1966).

[8]Solow,R. “Note on Uzawa’s Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies(1961-62),48-50.

[9]Uzawa,H. “On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies(1961-62),40-47.

[10]Uzawa,H. “On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth Ⅱ,” Review of Economic Studies(1963),105-118.

Barreira,A.,and Kallis,G. 2003. ‘The EU Water Framework Directive and Public Participation in Transboundary River Basin Management’. pp.92-103 in Environmental Information in European Transboundary Water Management,eds. J.G. Timmerman and S. Langass. London,IWA Publishing.

Brack,D. 2009. ‘Combating Illegal Logging:Interaction with WTO Rules’. Energy,Enviroment and Resource Governance Illegal Logging Briefing Paper 2009/01. London:Chatham House.

Brack,D. 2010. ‘Controlling Illegal Logging:Consumer Country Measures’. Energy,Enviroment and Resource Governance Illegal Logging Briefing Paper 2010/01. London:Chatham House.

Cashore,B.,Auld,G.,Bernstein,S.,and McDermott,C. 2007. ‘Can Non-State Governanc. ‘Ratchet Up’ Global Environmental Standards?Lessons from the Forest Sector’. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 16:158-172.

Cohen,J. and Sabel,C.F. 1997. ‘Directly-deliberative Polyarchy’. European Law Journal 3:313-340.

Cohen,J. and Sabel,C.F. 2003. ‘Sovereignty and Solidarity:EU and US’. pp. 345-375 in Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy:European and American Experiments,eds. J. Zeitlin and D.M. Trubek. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

D?browska,P. 2010. ‘EU Governance of GMOs:Political Struggles and Experimentalist Solutions?’. pp. 174-214 in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture,eds. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Dewey,J. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York:Henry Holt.

Eberlein,B. 2010. ‘Experimentalist Governance in the European Energy Sector’. pp. 61-79 in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture,eds. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Fung,A,2004. Empowered Participation:Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press.

Gerstenberg,O. and Sabel,C.F. 2002. ‘Directly Deliberative Polyarchy:An Institutional Ideal for Europe?’. pp. 289-331 in Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market,eds. C. Joerges and R. Dehousse. Oxford:Oxford University Press,289-341.

Henson,S. and Humphrey,J. 2009. The Impacts of Private Food Safety Standards on the Food Chain and on Public Standard-Setting Processes. Paper prepared for FAO/WHO,Rome:Codex Alimentarius Commission.

Karkkainen,B.C. 2006. ‘Information-Forcing Regulation:Penalty Defaults,Destabilization Rights,and New Environmental Governance’. pp. 293-322 in Law and New Governance in the EU and the US,eds. G. de Búrca and J. Scott. Oxford:Hart.

Kemple,J.J. 2011. ‘Children First and Student Outcomes:2003-2010’. pp. 255-291 in Education Reform in New York City:Ambitious Change in the Nation’s Most Complex School System. Cambridge,MA:Harvard Education Press.

Kjaer,P.F. 2010. Between Governing and Governance:On the Origin,Function,and Form of Europe’s Post-National Constitution. Oxford:Hart.

Lawson,S.,and MacFaul,L. 2010. Illegal Logging and Related Trade:Indicators of the Global Response. London,Chatham House.

Noonan,K.,Sabel,C.F.,and Simon,W.H. 2009. ‘Legal Accountability in the Service-Based Welfare State. Law & Social Inquiry 34(3):523-568.

Oakes,J.,Rogers,J. and Lipton,M. 2006. Learning Power:Organizing for Education and Justice. New York:Teacher’s College Press.

Official Journal of the European Union. 2010. ‘Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council o. 20 Octobe. 2010 laying down the obligations of operations who place timber and timber products on the market’. Official Journal. 295/23-34,12.11.2010.

Overdevest,C. 2009. ‘Exporting Experimentalism and the Case of FLEGT’. Unpublished memo prepared for the project on ‘Extending Experimentalist Governance:From the EU to the World?’. University of Wisconsin-Madison,March 6-7.

Parker,R.W. 2001.‘The Case for Environmental Trade Sanctions’. Widener Law Symposium Journal7:21-28.

Sabel,Charles F. 1994. ‘Learning by Monitoring:The Institutions of Economic Development’. pp. 137-165 in Handbook of Economic Sociology,eds. N. Smelser and R. Swedberg. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,and New York:Russell Sage Foundation.

Sabel,Charles F. 2004. ‘Beyond Principal-Agent Governance Experimentalist Organizations,Learning and Accountability’ pp. 173-195 in De Staat van de Democratie. Democratie voorbij de Staat,eds. E. Engelen and M. Sie Dhian Ho. Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press.

Sabel,Charles F. 2005. ‘A Real Time Revolution in Routines’. pp. 106-156 in The Firm as a Collaborative Community,eds. C. Heckscher and P.S. Adler. Oxford:Oxford University Press,106-156.

Sabel,Charles F.and Simon,William H. 2004. ‘Destabilization Rights:How Public Law Litigation Succeeds’. Harvard Law Review 117:1015-1101.

Sabel,Charles F. forthcoming. ‘Minimalism and Experimentalism in American Public Law’. Georgetown Law Review.

Sabel,C.F.,Saxenian,A.,Miettinen,R.,Kristensen,P.H.,and Hautam?ki,J. forthcoming. Individualized Service Provision as the Key to the New Welfare State:Lessons from Special Education in Finland. Helsinki:SITRA.

Sabel,C.F.,and Zeitlin,J. 2008. ‘Learning from Difference:The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union’. European Law Journal 14:271-327.

Sabel,C.F.,and Zeitlin,J. 2010a. ‘Learning from Difference:The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union’. pp. 1-28 in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture,eds. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Sabel,C.F.,and Zeitlin,J. (eds)2010b. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture. Oxford,Oxford University Press.

Scott,J. and Holder,J. 2006. ‘Law and New Environmental Governance in the European Union’. pp. 211-242 in Law and New Governance in the EU and the US,eds. G. de Búrca and J. Scott. Oxford:Hart.

Simon,W.H. 2001. The Community Economic Development Movement:Law,Business,and the New Social Policy. Stanford:Stanford University Press.

Svetiev,Y. 2010. ‘Networked Competition Governance in the EU:Centralization,Decentralization,or Experimentalist Architecture?’. pp. 79-120 in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture,eds. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

van der Wilk,N. 2010. ‘China and the EU’s Normative Approach to Africa:Competitor or Collaborator?A Case Study of Forest Law Enforcement,Governance and Trade (FLEGT)’. Unpublished M.A. thesis,University of Amsterdam.

von Homeyer,I. 2010. ‘Emerging Experimentalism in EU Environmental Governance’. pp. 121-150 in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture,eds. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Vos,Ellen. 2010. ‘Responding to Catastrophe:Towards a New Architecture for EU Food Safety Regulation?’. pp. 151-176 in Experimentalist Governance in the European Union:Towards a New Architecture,eds. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin. Oxford:Oxford University Press..

Weinstein,M.M.,and Charnovitz,S. 2001. ‘The Greening of the WTO’. Foreign Affairs 80:147-156.

Zeitlin,J. 2011. ‘Presidential Address:Pragmatic Transnationalism:Governing across Borders in the Global Economy’. Socio-Economic Review9:1-20.