篇章数

20

引证文献

0 !

参考文献

370

海上共同开发国际法问题研究图书

International Legal Issues on Joint Development in the Sea

SSAPID:101-6080-8993-12
ISBN:978-7-5097-8884-4
DOI:
ISSN:

[内容简介] 近年来,海上共同开发问题备受关注。本书为教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目——“海上共同开发国际案例与实践研究”的研究成果之一。全书共分三篇,上篇“海上共同开发的国际法理论”是对共同开发的基本理论的阐述,以及对既有案例研究后所进行的理论归纳;中篇“海上共同开发的国际实践”是对个案的分析并结合中国国情提出相关建议;下篇“海洋法问题”是对与共同开发密切相关的若干海洋法问题的分析论证。

相关信息

丛书名:武汉大学边界与海洋问题研究丛书
编 辑:许玉燕;刘晶晶;林兆功
出版社:社会科学文献出版社
出版时间: 2016年07月
语 种:中文;英文
中图分类:D8 外交、国际关系

 文前辅文

 前言

 上篇 海上共同开发的国际法理论

  第一章 海上共同开发的基本法律制度

   一 海上共同开发的意涵与性质

    (一)海上共同开发的意涵

    (二)海上共同开发的性质

     1.形式上——书面协定

     2.实质上——具法律规范的特性

   二 海上共同开发的法律规范

    (一)海上共同开发制度的国际成文法依据

     1.立法条约

     2.契约条约

    (二)海上共同开发制度是否为国际习惯的评析

     1.肯定说

     2.否定说

     3.几点认识

    (三)国际法院判例

   三 实施海上共同开发的相关问题

    (一)海上共同开发协定的主体

     1.原则上是一个国家(State)

     2.有海域权利重叠情形

     3.《海洋法公约》生效致使上述条件可能发生变化

    (二)海上共同开发协定的客体

     1.海上共同开发的区域

     2.海上共同开发的标的

    (三)海上共同开发区域的主权归属

     1.共管

     2.搁置主权争议

     3.冻结主权主张

    (四)海上共同开发区域管辖权的界定

    (五)海上共同开发制度管理模式的探讨

     1.超国家管理模式

     2.双方政府共同管理模式

     3.代理制模式

     4.合资机构共同经营模式

    (六)海上共同开发制度于实施时所可采用的契约模式

     1.国际契约

     2.国内契约

   四 结论

  第二章 海上共同开发“区块”的选择问题

   一 海上共同开发“区块”选择的理论与实践

    (一)海上共同开发“区块”的地理范围

     1. 跨界共同开发“区块”的地理范围

     2.争议海区共同开发“区块”的地理范围

    (二)海上共同开发“区块”的面积

    (三)海上共同开发“区块”与领海的关系

   二 影响海上共同开发“区块”选择的主要因素

    (一)政治意愿

    (二)经济考量

    (三)所涉国家的多寡

    (四)主张的合法性

    (五)文化因素

   三 中国与有关国家在南海共同开发“区块”的选择问题

    (一)拓展在南海的地理和资源的调查活动

     1.南沙岛礁

     2.南海油气资源

    (二)选择南海共同开发的“区块”宜小

    (三)鼓励石油公司积极参与南海的共同开发活动

    (四)南海潜在的共同开发“区块”

     1.北部湾

     2.万安滩盆地

     3.礼乐滩盆地

     4.曾母暗沙盆地

     5.纳土纳海域

   四 结论

    (一)海上共同开发“区块”的选择并不影响海上边界的划定

    (二)明确争议海区的存在有助于划定海上共同开发“区块”

    (三)海上共同开发安排不存在“绝对的输赢”(no gain no loss)之别

    (四)海上共同开发通常不能一蹴而就

  第三章 海上共同开发区的法律适用(一)

   一 海上共同开发区适用的法律

    (一)缔约国之间所缔结的条约(基本条约、补充协定、附件)

    (二)共同开发管理机构所制订的适用于共同开发区的规则

    (三)根据条约可以在共同开发区内适用的缔约国国内法或其他国家的国内法

   二 跨界共同开发区的法律适用

    (一)跨界共同开发区的法律适用的一般情况

    (二)特殊情况

     1.沙特阿拉伯—巴林共同开发案

     2.塞内加尔—几内亚比绍共同开发案

     3.阿布扎比—卡塔尔共同开发案

   三 争议海区共同开发区的法律适用

    (一)共同开发区作为单一整体进行开发时的法律适用

     1.缔约国之间缔结的关于争议海区共同开发的条约文本

     2.共同开发管理机构所制定的适用于共同开发区的规则

     3.根据条约可以在共同开发区内适用的国内法

     4.特殊情况

    (二)共同开发区被划分为若干块时的法律适用

     1.共同开发区被划分为两块

     2.共同开发区被划分为三块

     3.共同开发区被分为九块

   四 综合共同开发区的法律适用

    (一)共同石油开发区的法律适用

    (二)Greater Sunrise区域的法律适用

   五 结论

    (一)影响海上共同开发区的法律适用的因素

     1.共同开发的种类

     2.共同开发的模式

     3.共同开发区的划分

     4.当事国与共同开发区的密切程度

    (二)对中国的启示

     1.遵循先易后难原则

     2.注意开发模式的转换

     3.注意区分不同事项

     4.充分考虑共同开发区的远近

     5.重视对争议海区进行商业招标等商业活动

  第四章 海上共同开发区的法律适用(二)

   一 海上共同开发区法律适用的不同情形

    (一)争议海域海上共同开发区的法律适用

    (二)跨界海上共同开发区的法律适用

    (三)国家专属管辖范围内海上共同开发区的法律适用

    (四)200海里以外大陆架上的海上共同开发区的法律适用

    (五)国家管辖范围以外海上共同开发区的法律适用

   二 海上共同开发区法律适用的国际实践

    (一)分别适用

     1.绝对的分别适用

     2.相对的分别适用

    (二)共同适用

    (三)综合适用

   三 海上共同开发区适用的主要法律

    (一)国际法

     1.《海洋法公约》

     2.共同开发协定

     3.与航行、捕鱼活动以及环境保护有关的国际法律制度

     4.国际习惯

     5.国际司法判例

    (二)国际石油开发合同

    (三)特别法

    (四)国内法

   四 认识与启示

    (一)国际社会并没有有关海上共同开发区法律适用的统一标准

    (二)海上共同开发区适用的法律应以国际法为基础

    (三)各国在海上共同开发的实践中一般倾向于适用本国法律

    (四)确立有利于维护中国国家利益的海上共同开发法律适用模式

  第五章 南海潜在共同开发区的法律适用问题

   一 影响海上共同开发区法律适用的因素

    (一)共同开发的种类

    (二)共同开发的管理模式

    (三)共同开发区的划分

    (四)当事国与共同开发区之间关系的密切程度

    (五)不同事项的主权色彩

    (六)共同开发区的远近

    (七)各国的政治环境

   二 南海潜在共同开发区的法律适用问题

    (一)中国与越南

     1.南海北部区域

     2.南海南部区域

    (二)中国与马来西亚

    (三)中国与印度尼西亚

     1.借鉴“澳大利亚—印度尼西亚共同开发案”的经验

     2.天然气自身特性对运输工具的要求

    (四)中国与文莱

    (五)中国与菲律宾

   三 结语

  第六章 海上共同开发监督机制的构建

   一 建立海上共同开发监督机制的必要性

    (一)保障共同开发协定的实施需要建立监督机制

    (二)保障共同开发协定的实施效果需要进一步完善监督机制

   二 有关海上共同开发监督机制的实践

    (一)双向重复监督型

    (二)国有公司监督型

    (三)联合机构监督型

   三 共同开发监督机制的完善与新构建

    (一)国际组织参与监督机制在理论上是可行的

    (二)具体制度构建

     1.国际组织的介入方式

     2.监督模式的选定

     3.监督权实现的方式

     4.监督权行使的范围

     5.监督权行使的标准

     6.监督权的保障

   四 对中国的意义

  第七章 “搁置争议、共同开发”原则:困境与出路

   一 “搁置争议、共同开发”原则的困境

    (一)理论困局

     1.对“搁置争议、共同开发”原则有不同的理解

     2.“搁置争议、共同开发”只是划界前的一种临时性安排

    (二)现实挑战

     1.东海

     2.南海

   二 “搁置争议、共同开发”原则陷入困境的原因

    (一)政治意愿缺乏

    (二)现实需要不强

    (三)岛屿主权争议

    (四)争议海域(海区)模糊

    (五)外部势力干扰

   三 “搁置争议、共同开发”原则的发展前景

    (一)推动相关国家达成“搁置争议、共同开发”共识

    (二)进一步明确中国的具体海洋权利主张

    (三)寻找突破口、树立“搁置争议、共同开发”原则实践的典范

    (四)不过分依赖外交谈判的方法

    (五)做好用法律方法解决争端的准备

  第八章 海上共同开发的发展趋势

   一 海上共同开发的领域由以油气资源开发为主向海上观光旅游等多领域延伸

    (一)从海上生物资源的共同开发来讲,它既有国际条约的规定,也有国际案例的支持

    (二)就海上观光旅游的共同开发而言,它已逐渐成为有关国家的共识

   二 海上共同开发的理论基础由以国际合作原则为核心向多项国际法原则汇聚

    (一)国家主权平等原则

     1.坚持国家主权平等原则,有利于海上共同开发协议的达成

     2.坚持国家主权平等原则,有利于海上共同开发协议的实施

    (二)国际合作原则

    (三)和平解决国际争端原则

   三 海上共同开发的法律依据由以条约为主向多种国际法渊源并存发展

    (一)国际条约

     1.《海洋法公约》

     2.双边条约

    (二)国际习惯

    (三)一般法律原则

    (四)司法判例

    (五)国际组织的决议

   四 海上共同开发呈向习惯国际法规则方向发展之势

    (一)众多共同开发案例是海上共同开发习惯国际法规则形成的物质要件

    (二)绝大多数国家对《海洋法公约》及其有关条款的接受是海上共同开发习惯国际法规则形成的心理要件

    (三)海上共同开发明显不同于单方面开发,它含有相互约束的义务

     1.善意谈判的义务

     2.禁止单方开发的义务

   五 几点认识

 中篇 海上共同开发的国际实践

  第九章 巴林与沙特阿拉伯大陆架划界暨资源共享案

   一 巴林与沙特阿拉伯大陆架划界谈判背景

   二 巴林与沙特阿拉伯划界暨资源共享安排谈判

   三 巴林与沙特阿拉伯划界暨资源共享安排协定达成原因

   四 巴林与沙特阿拉伯资源共享案的特殊性及其意义

  第十章 日韩共同开发案

   一 日韩东海大陆架油气争端的产生

   二 日韩共同开发的谈判过程

    (一)阻碍谈判的因素

     1.日本《采矿法》(Mining Law)与共同开发协定冲突

     2.日本海洋法律政策阻碍

     3.日本国内政治派别之间意见分歧

     4.中国和朝鲜抗议*

    (二)促成谈判的因素

     1.国际环境的影响

     2.对潜在资源的评估

     3.日韩合作委员会的努力

     4.自民党的推进和民社党的支持

     5.日本政府政策的不断完善

     6.韩国政府的压力

   三 日韩共同开发协定的主要内容及其后续进展

    (一)日韩共同开发协定的主要内容

     1.共同开发区域

     2.日韩联合委员会

     3.分区块特许权人的确定

     4.开发区的法律适用

     5.争端的解决

    (二)共同开发的后续进展

   四 日韩共同开发案对中国的启示

  第十一章 The Impact of the Joint Development Agreement between Korea and Japan in the East China Sea on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf

   Ⅰ Introduction

   Ⅱ Geological,Geographical and Geomorphologic Circumstances of the East China Sea

   Ⅲ Examination of the Joint Development Zone

    1.Definition

    2.Legal Grounds

    3.General Examination

    4.Problems

   Ⅳ The Joint Development Zone between Korea and Japan

   Ⅴ Relevant Cases

    1.Malaysia-Thailand

    2.Malaysia-Vietnam

    3.Australia-Indonesia

    4.Venezuela-Trinidad & Tobago

    5.China-Japan

   Ⅵ Conclusions

  第十二章 尼日利亚—圣多美和普林西比共同开发案

   一 尼日利亚—圣多美和普林西比共同开发案的背景及影响因素

    (一)尼日利亚—圣多美和普林西比共同开发案的背景

     1.外部势力对几内亚湾石油资源的激烈争夺

     2.几内亚湾地区海上划界争端突出

    (二)尼日利亚—圣多美和普林西比共同开发案的影响因素

   二 尼日利亚—圣多美和普林西比共同开发案的主要内容及其存在的问题

    (一)主要内容

    (二)存在的问题

   三 对中国的启示

  第十三章 争议海域共同开发的前提及对南海共同开发的启示

   一 争议海域共同开发的前提

    (一)适格的主体

     1.争议海域共同开发适格主体的条件

     2.适格主体的数量

    (二)有效的主张

    (三)确定的共同开发区

    (四)“谈判”和“克制”的义务

    (五)政府间强烈的合作意愿

   二 南海尚不具备共同开发的可能性

    (一)南海共同开发的适格主体

    (二)南海各方的主张不符合要求

    (三)南海共同开发区难以确定

    (四)南海争议国家遵守“谈判”和“克制”义务的情况

    (五)南海争议各方的合作意愿不足

   三 对南海共同开发的启示

    (一)选择适格的主体

    (二)明确南海主张范围和性质

    (三)确定合适的共同开发区

    (四)积极应对相关国家的单边行为

    (五)适当妥协

   四 结论

  第十四章 半闭海制度对南海低敏感领域合作的启示

   一 半闭海制度及其在南海的适用

    (一)半闭海制度的由来

    (二)半闭海制度在南海的适用

     1.半闭海的定义

     2.半闭海的合作

   二 半闭海——地中海区域的合作实践

    (一)海洋生物资源管理

    (二)海洋环境保护

    (三)地中海区域合作实践的成功因素分析

   三 半闭海制度下的合作实践对南海低敏感领域合作的启示

    (一)南海的区域合作现状

    (二)南海开展区域合作的困难

     1.南海区域合作的现状分析

     2.南海开展区域合作的困难所在

    (三)半闭海制度及其实践对南海低敏感领域合作的启示

     1.正确评价南海区域合作中的信任问题

     2.合理借鉴地中海区域合作模式的成功经验

     3.以南海区域各方的共同关切为基础,进一步拓展《联合国海洋法公约》框架下合作的深度与广度

  第十五章 《中日东海问题原则共识》与东海共同开发

   一 《中日东海问题原则共识》及其后续进展

   二 东海共同开发的法律障碍

    (一)钓鱼岛问题

    (二)防空识别区问题

   三 推进东海共同开发的法律建议

  第十六章 2012年中海油发布南海油气对外招标公告的法律问题

   一 招标区块位于中越争议海域的可能性

   二 中海油发布招标公告的合法性问题

   三 招标公告对中国在南海断续线内权利主张的影响

   四 结论

 下篇 海洋法问题

  第十七章 《海洋法公约》第82条的执行:问题与前景

   一 《海洋法公约》第82条执行问题的产生

    (一)外大陆架资源的开发前景

    (二)相关国家的实践

   二 《海洋法公约》第82条的主要内容及其存在的问题

    (一)《海洋法公约》第82条的主要内容

    (二)《海洋法公约》第82条与其他条款的关系

     1.与《海洋法公约》第76条的关系

     2.与《海洋法公约》第11部分的关系

     3.与《海洋法公约》其他条款的关系

    (三)《海洋法公约》第82条存在的问题

     1.沿海国承担缴付费用或实物义务的性质问题

     2.缴付费用或实物问题

     3.公平分享的标准问题

     4.管理局的作用及其开支问题

     5.有关矿址的非生物资源超出外大陆架界限的问题

     6.争端解决问题

   三 《海洋法公约》第82条的发展前景

    (一)呼之欲出的《第82条示范协定》

    (二)中国的对策

     1.深入研究《海洋法公约》第82条的执行问题

     2.进一步完善中国国内相关的法律制度

  第十八章 关键日期及其在南海海域划界争端中的适用

   一 关键日期的法律内涵

   二 关键日期在南海海域划界中适用的法律分析

   三 南海海域划界争端中的关键日期难以确定

    (一)国际司法判例对关键日期在海域划界中鲜有适用

    (二)海域划界司法案例中关键日期鲜有适用的原因

    (三)中国在南海权利主张的模糊性

   四 几点建议

  第十九章 中国南海问题国际话语权的构建

   一 中国南海问题国际话语权构建的原因

    (一)南海的重要性

    (二)避免国外媒体的炒作和国际社会的误解

    (三)改变东盟相关国家主导南海问题国际话语权的被动局面

    (四)更好地维护中国的国家利益,进一步提升中国作为负责任大国的国际形象

   二 中国南海问题国际话语权构建的原则

    (一)符合中国和平发展战略需要原则

    (二)遵守国际法基本原则

    (三)实现两岸协商原则

   三 中国南海问题国际话语权构建的方式

    (一)完善国内相关的政策与法律制度

     1.制定《中国南海中长期发展纲要》

     2.进一步明确中国的具体海洋权利主张

     3.进一步健全政府管理体制,统一领导南海事宜

    (二)借助各种外部平台增信释疑

     1.多边舞台

     2.双边谈判

     3.单方宣示

   四 中国南海问题国际话语权构建应注意的问题

    (一)运用和发展国际法

     1.以国际法为依据是国际社会的客观要求

     2.遵循国际法是中国政府对外交往的一贯主张

     3.运用和发展国际法有利于更好地维护中国的国家利益

    (二)主动引导、掌控国际话语权

     1.多种形式宣传中国处理周边海洋问题的方针政策

     2.主导或积极参与南海区域安全机制的构建

    (三)合理运用“核心利益”概念

  第二十章 中国在南海U形线内海域的历史性权利

   一 中国享有历史性权利还是历史性所有权

    (一)U形线的性质与线内海域的法律属性

    (二)历史性权利的概念与类型

    (三)历史性权利对中国南海主张的意义

   二 中国历史性所有权的取得与巩固

    (一)第一阶段:中国通过历史巩固过程取得对南海诸岛的历史性所有权

    (二)第二阶段:中国进而主张对南海诸岛附近海域的权利

    (三)第三阶段:根据《海洋法公约》完善中国在南海的权利主张

   三 中国的历史性主权权利及其现实意义

   四 结论

 总序

1.1958年沙特阿拉伯—巴林共同开发案(1)Bahrain-Saudi Arabia Boundary Agreement,22 February 1958(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/BHR-SAU1958BA.PDF)

2.1965年沙特阿拉伯—科威特共同开发案(1)Agreement between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the State of Kuwait on the Partition of the Neutral Zone,7 July 1965(UN Treaty Series,Vol.1750,I-30549)

2.1965年沙特阿拉伯—科威特共同开发案(2)Agreement between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the State of Kuwait concerning the Submerged Area Adjacent to the Divided Zone,2 July 2000 (http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/SAU-KWT2000SA.PDF)

3.1969年卡塔尔—阿布扎比共同开发案(1)Agreement between Qatar and Abu Dhabi on theSettlement of Maritime Boundary and Ownership of Islands,20 March 1969(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/QAT-ARE1969MB.PDF)

3.1969年卡塔尔—阿布扎比共同开发案(2)Agreement between the Government of the State of Qatar and the Government of the United Arab Emirates Relating to the Transmission of Gas by Pipelinebetween the State of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates,26 September 2004(http://www.almeezan.qa/AgreementsPage.aspx?id=1483&language=en)

4.1974年法国—西班牙共同开发案(1)Convention between France and Spain on the Delimitation of the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone in the Bay of Biscay,29 January 1974(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/FRA-ESP1974VZ.PDF)

4.1974年法国—西班牙共同开发案(2)Convention between the Government of the French Republic and the Government of the Spanish State on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelves of the Two States in the Bay of Biscay,29 January 1974(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/FRA-ESP1974CS.PDF)

5.1974年沙特阿拉伯—苏丹共同开发案(1)Agreement Relating to the Joint Exploitation of the Natural Resources of the Seabed and Subsoil of the Red Sea in the Common Zone,16 May 1974(Treaty Series Vol.952,I-13605)

6.1974年日本—韩国共同开发案(1)1974 Agreement between Japan and the Republic of Korea concerning Joint Development of the Southern Part of the Continental Shelf Adjacent to the Two Countries,30 January 1974(http://cil.nus.edu.sg/rp/il/pdf/1974%20 Agreement%20between%20Japan%20and%20Korea%20Concerning%20JD%20of%20the%20Southern%20Part%20of%20Continental%20Shelf-pdf.pdf)

7.1975年伊朗—伊拉克共同开发案(1)The Algiers Accord,6 March 1975(http://mideastweb.org/algiersaccord.htm)

7.1975年伊朗—伊拉克共同开发案(2)Treaty concerning the Frontier and Neighbourly Relations between Iran and Iraq,13 June 1975 (http://www.parstimes.com/history/iran_iraq_1975.html)

7.1975年伊朗—伊拉克共同开发案(3)Agreementbetween Iran and Iraq concerning the Use of Frontier Watercourses,26 December 1975(http://www.ucdp.uu.se/gpdatabase/peace/Iran-Iraq%2019751226b.pdf)

8.1976年英国—挪威共同开发案(1)Agreement Relating to the Exploitation of the Frigg Field Reservoir and the Transmission of Gas Therefrom to the United Kingdom,10 May 1976(Vol.1098,I-16878)

8.1976年英国—挪威共同开发案(2)Agreement Relating to the Exploration of the Murchison Field Reservoir and the Offtake of the PetroleumTherefrom,16 October 1979

8.1976年英国—挪威共同开发案(3)Agreement Relating to the Exploitation of the Statfjord Field Reservoirs and the Offtake of PetroleumTherefrom,16 October 1979

9.1979年马来西亚—泰国共同开发案(1)Memorandum of understanding between Malaysia and the Kingdom of Thailand on the Establishment of the Joint Authority for the Exploitation of the Resources of the Seabed in a DefinedArea of the Continental Shelf of the Two Countries in the Gulf of Thailand 1979,21 February 1979(http://cil.nus.edu.sg/rp/il/pdf/1979%20MOU%20between%20Malaysia%20and%20Thailand-pdf.pdf)

9.1979年马来西亚—泰国共同开发案(2)1990 Agreement between Thailand and Malaysia on theConstitution and Other Matters Relating to the Joint Authority,30 May 1990(http://cil.nus.edu.sg/rp/il/pdf/1990%20Agreement%20between%20Malaysia%20and%20Thailan d%20on%20the%20MTJA-pdf.pdf)

9.1979年马来西亚—泰国共同开发案(3)Malaysia-Thailand Joint Authority (Standards of Petroleum Operations) Regulations 1997(http://www.mtja.org/GIF/rules/regulations.pdf)

9.1979年马来西亚—泰国共同开发案(4)Malaysia-Thailand Joint Authority Procedures for Drilling Operations 2009(http://www.mtja.org/pdf/rules/MTJA_procedures_for_drilling_operations_rev1_14dec09_bw.pdf)

9.1979年马来西亚—泰国共同开发案(5)Malaysia-Thailand Joint Authority Procedures for Production Operations 2009(http://www.mtja.org/pdf/rules/MTJA_procedures_for_production_operations_rev1_14dec09_bwpdf)

10.1981年美国—加拿大缅因湾共同开发案(1)Treaty to Submit to Binding Dispute Settlement the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area,29 March 1979(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/CAN-USA1979GM.PDF)

10.1981年美国—加拿大缅因湾共同开发案(2)Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area,Judgment,ICJ Reports 1984(http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/67/6369.pdf)

11.1981年冰岛—挪威共同开发案(1)Agreement on the Continental Shelf between Iceland and Jan Mayen,22 October 1981 (http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/ISL-NOR1981CS.PDF)

11.1981年冰岛—挪威共同开发案(2)Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen,Judgment,ICJ Reports 1993 (http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/78/6743.pdf)

12.1988年突尼斯—利比亚共同开发案(1)Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) Judgment,ICJ Reports 1982,(http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/63/6267.pdf)

13.1989年澳大利亚—印度尼西亚共同开发案(1)Treaty between Australia and the Republic of Indonesia on the Zone of Cooperation in an Area between the Indonesian Province of East Timor and Northern Australia,11 December 1989(http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1991/9.html)

14.1992年马来西亚—越南共同开发案(1)1992 Memorandum of Understanding between Malaysia and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam for the Exploration and Exploitation of Petroleum in a Defined Area of the Continental Shelf Involving the Two Countries,5 June 1992(http://cil.nus.edu.sg/rp/il/pdf/1992%20MOU%20between%20Malaysia%20and%20Vietnam%20for%20the%20Exploration%20and%20Exploitation%20of%20Petroleum-pdf.pdf)

15.1993年哥伦比亚—牙买加共同开发案(1)Maritime Delimitation Treaty between Jamaica and the Republic of Colombia,12 November 1993(http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/JAM-COL1993MD.PDF)

16.1993年塞内加尔—几内亚比绍共同开发案(1)Management and Cooperation Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Senegal and the Government of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau,14 October 1993(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/SEN-GNB1993MC.PDF)

17.2000年中国—越南北部湾共同开发案(1)2000年12月25日《中华人民共和国和越南社会主义共和国关于两国在北部湾领海、专属经济区和大陆架的划界协定》(http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2004-08/04/content_5332197.htm)

17.2000年中国—越南北部湾共同开发案(2)2000年12月25日《中华人民共和国政府和越南社会主义共和国政府北部湾渔业合作协定》

18.2001年尼日利亚—圣多美和普林西比共同开发案(1)Treaty between the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of SaoTome and Principe on the Joint Development of Petroleum andOther Resources,in Respect of Areas of the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Two States,21 February 2001(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/STP-NGA2001.PDF)

19.2001年泰国—柬埔寨共同开发案(1)Memorandum of Understanding between the Royal Thai Government and the Royal Government of Cambodia regarding the Area ofTheir Overlapping Maritime Claims to the Continental Shelf,18 June 2001

19.2001年泰国—柬埔寨共同开发案(2)Termination of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Royal Thai Government and the Royal Government of Cambodia regarding the Area of Their Overlapping Maritime Claims to the Continental Shelf,(http://www.ryt9.com/es/mfa/88839)

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(1)Timor Sea Treaty between the Government of East Timor and the Government of Australia,20 May 2002(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/AUS-TLS2002TST.PDF)

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(2)Exchange of Notes Constituting an Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste concerning Arrangements for Exploration and Exploitation of Petroleum in an Area of theTimor Sea between Australia and East Timor,20 May 2002(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/AUS-TLS2002EX.PDF)

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(3)Petroleum Mining Code for the Joint Petroleum Development Area,(http://www.anp-tl.org/webs/anptlweb.nsf/vwAll/Resource-Petroleum%20Mining%20Code/$File/PMCtoCoM0602.pdf?openelement)

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(4)Product Sharing Contract for the Joint Petroleum Development Area(http://www.laohamutuk.org/Oil/PetRegime/JPDA%20PSC%208-05.pdf)

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(5)Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Democratic Republic of East Timor and the Government of Australia concerning an International Unitization Agreement for the Greater Sunrise field,20 May 2002

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(6)Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste Relating to the UnitiZation of the SunriseTroubador Fields,6 March 2003(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/AUS-TLS2002SUN.PDF)

20.2002年澳大利亚—东帝汶共同开发案(7)Treaty between Australia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste on Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea,12 January 2006

21.2003年巴巴多斯—圭亚那共同开发案(1)Exclusive Economic Zone Cooperation Treaty between the Republic of Guyana and the State of Barbados concerning the Exercise of Jurisdiction inTheir Exclusive Economic Zone in the Area of Bilateral Overlap within Each of Their Outer Limits and beyond the Outer Limits of the Exclusive Economic Zones of Other States,2 December 2003(The Law of the Sea Bulletins,No.55,p.36)

22.2006年密克罗尼西亚—马歇尔群岛共同开发案(1)Treaty between the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands concerning Maritime Boundaries and Cooperation on Related Matters,6 July 2006

23.2008年中国—日本共同开发案(1)2008年6月18日,《中日东海原则共识》(http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2008-06/18/content_1020543.htm)

24.2009年马来西亚—文莱共同开发案(1)The Exchange of Letters between Malaysia and Brunei,16 March 2009(http://www.thestar.com.my/story/?file=%2f2010%2f5%2f3%2fnation%2f20100503123605&sec=nation)

25.2010年俄罗斯—挪威共同开发案(1)Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation concerning Maritime Delimitation and Cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean,15 September 2010(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/NOR-RUS2010.PDF)

26.2012年美国—墨西哥共同开发案(1)Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Mexican States on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf in the Western Gulf of Mexico beyond 200 Nautical Miles,9 June 2000(http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/USA-MEX2000CS.PDF)

26.2012年美国—墨西哥共同开发案(2)Agreement between the United States and Mexicoconcerning Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico,20 February 2012(http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/185467.pdf)

1.北海大陆架案:North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark;Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1969。

2.爱琴海大陆架案:Aegean Sea Continental Shelf,Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1978。

3.利比亚—突尼斯大陆架划界案:Continental Shelf case (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1982。

4.缅因湾划界案:Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area,Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1984。

5.利比亚—马耳他划界案:Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1985。

6.扬马延岛划界案:Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen,Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1993。

7.东帝汶案:East Timor (Portugal v. Australia),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 1995。

8.巴林—卡塔尔划界案:Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahrain),Merits,Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 2001。

9.尼日利亚—喀麦隆划界案:Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria:Equatorial Guinea Intervening),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 2002。

10.尼加拉瓜—洪都拉斯划界案:Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 2007。

11.罗马尼亚—乌克兰黑海划界案:Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 2009。

12.尼加拉瓜—哥伦比亚划界案:Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia),Judgment,I.C.J. Reports 2012。

1.孟加拉—缅甸孟加拉湾划界案:Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal,Judgment of 14 March 2012,Case n. 16。

1.英法大陆架案:Anglo-French Continental Shelf Arbitration (1977-1978)。

2.英国—北爱尔兰—法国大陆架划界案:Arbitration between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the French Republic on the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf,Decision of the Court of Arbitration Dated 30 June 1977。

3.几内亚—几内亚比绍划界案:Case concerning the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Guinea and Guinea-Bissau,Arbitral Award of 14 February 1985。

4.厄立特里亚—也门划界案:The Eritrea-Yemen,Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Stage of the Proceedings (Maritime Delimitation),17 December 1999。

5.巴巴多斯—特立尼达和多巴哥划界案:Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago,Award of the Arbitral Tribunal,11 April 2006。

6.圭亚那—苏里南划界案:Guyana/Suriname,Award of the Arbitral Tribunal,17 September 2007。

7.孟加拉—印度划界案:Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India (Bangladesh v. India),P.C.A. Award 7 July 2014。

1.Mark J. Valencia(eds.),The South China Sea:Hydrocarbon Potential and Possibilities of Joint Development,Pergamon Press,1981.

2.S.P.Jagota,Maritime Boundary,Kluwer Academic Publishers,1985.

3.Keith H. Blinn,Claude Duval,Honore Le Leuch and Andre Pertuzio,International Petroleum Exploration and Exploitation Agreements:Legal,Economic and Policy Aspects,Euromoncy Publications,1986.

4.Kriangsak Kittichaisaree,The Law of the Sea and Maritime Boundary Delimitation in Southeast Asia,Oxford University Press,1988.

5.Dallmeyer,Rights to Oceanic Resources:Deciding and Drawing Maritime Boundaries,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,1989.

6.Hazel Fox et al. (eds.),Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas:A Model Agreement for States for Joint Development with Explanatory Commentary,British Institute of International & Comparative Law,1989.

7.Hazel Fox et al.(eds.),Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas (Volume II),The Institute’s Revised Model Agreement. British Institute of International & Comparative Law,1990.

8.Jonathan I. Charney & Smith,Robert W(eds.),International Maritime Boundaries,Vols.1-2,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,1993.

9.Gerald H Blake,William J Hidesley,Martin A Pratt,Rebecca J Ridley,Clive H Schofield. The Peaceful Management of Transboundary Resources,Graham & Trotman Limited,1995.

10.Gerald Blake,Boundaries and Energy:Problems and Prospects,Springer,1998.

11.Robert Kolb,Case Law on Equitable Maritime Delimitation:Digest and Commentaries,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2003.

12.Sun Pyo Kim,Maritime Delimitation and Interim Arrangements in North East Asia,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2004.

13.Colson,David A. & Robert W. Smith(eds.),International Maritime Boundaries,Vols.5,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2005.

14.J. R. V. Prescott,The Maritime Political Boundaries of the World,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2005.

15.Zou Keyuan,Law of the Sea in East Asia:Issue and Prospects,Routledge,2005.

16.Natalie Klein,Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,Cambridge University Press,2005.

17.Nordquist,Myron H.Moore,John Norton.Fu,Kuen-che,Recent Developments in the Law of the Sea and China,Brill Academic Pub,2005.

18.Yoshifumi Tanaka,Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation,Hart Publishing,2006.

19.Rainer Lagoni and Daniel Vignes,Maritime Delimitation,Martinus Nijhoff,2006.

20.Thomas J. Hall and Kelly L.Frey,Joint Development Agreements Line by Line:A Detailed Look at Joint Development Agreements and How to Change Them to Meet Your Needs,Thomson West/Aspatore,2009.

21.Seoung-Yong Hong and Jon M. Van Dyke,Maritime Boundary Disputes,Settlement Processes,and the Law of the Sea,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2009.

22.Seoung-Yong Hong and Jon M. Van Dyke(eds.),Maritime Boundary Disputes,Settlement Processes,and the Law of the Sea,Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2009.

23.J. Tanga Biang,The Joint Development Zone between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe:A Case of Provisional Arrangement in the Gulf of Guinea,International Law,State Practice and Prospects for Regional Integration,2010 (http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages/fellows_papers/tanga_0910_cameroon.pdf).

24.Min Gyo Koo,Island Disputes and Maritime Regime Building in East Asia between a Rock and a Hard Place,Springer-Verlag New York,2010.

25.Rainer Lagoni,Peter Ehlers & Marian Paschke(eds.),Recent Developments in the Law of the Sea,LIT Verlag,2010.

26.Nicholas Chinedu Eze,Rethinking Maritime Delimitation and Promoting Joint Development of Petroleum:The Nigeria-Sao Tome and Principe Joint Development Model,2011(https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/37104).

27.Iyadah John Viko,The International Court of Justice and Boundary Delimitation:The Methodology of the International Court of Justice in Boundary Delimitation:Joint Development the Way Forward,LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing,2012.

28.Clive Schofield(eds.),Maritime Energy Resources in Asia:Legal Regimes and Cooperation,The National Bureau of Asian Research,2012.

29.Robert Beckman(eds.),Beyond Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea,Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,2013.

30.Vasco Becker-Weinberg,Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Law of the Sea,Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2014.

31.Stefan Talmon and Bing Bing Jia(eds.),The South China Sea Arbitration:A Chinese Perspective,Hart Publishing,2014.

1.Josef L. Kunz,“Continental Shelf and International Law:Confusion and Abuse,” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.50,No.4,1956.

2.Elmer F.Bennett,“A Symposium on Federal,State and Local Cooperation in Conservation and Development of Water Resources,” California Law Review,Vol.45,1957.

3.William E.Kenworthy,“Joint Development of International Waters,” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.54,1960.

4.William T.Onorato,“Apportionment of an International Common Petroleum Deposit,” International and Comparative Law Quartely,Vol.17,1968.

5.David R.Levin,“New Directions in Land Acquisition and Land Use,” Wisconsin Law Review,1969.

1.Leonard B.Terr,“The‘Distance Plus Joint Development Zone’Formula:A Proposal for the Speedy and Practical Resolution of the East China and Yellow Seas Continental Shelf Oil Controversy,” Cornell International Law Journal,Vol.7,No.49,1973.

2.Choon-Ho Park,“Oil under Troubled Waters:The Northeast Asia Seabed Controversy,” Harvard International Law Journal,Vol.14,1973.

3.Choon-Ho Park,“The Sino-Japanese-Korean Sea Resources Controversy and the Hypothesis of a 200-Mile Economic Zone,” Harvard International Law Journal,Vol.16,1975.

4.J.C.Woodliffe,“International Unitization of an Offshore Gas Field,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.26,No.2,1977.

5.J.C.Phillips,“The Exclusive Economic Zone as a Concept in International Law,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.26,No.3,1977.

6.Hungdah Chiu,“South China Sea Islands:Implications for Delimiting the Seabed and Future Shipping Routes,” China Quarterly,1977.

7.P.K.Menon,“International Boundaries—A Case Study of the Guyana-Surinam Boundary,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.27,No.4,1978.

8.Rainer Lagoni,“Oil and Gas Deposit across National Frontiers,” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.73,1979.

1.Choon-Ho Park,“Offshore Oil Development in the China Seas:Some Legal and Territorial Issues,” Ocean Yearbook,Vo.2,1980.

2.Rufus W. Oliver Ⅲ,William R. Burke,“The Sherman Act and Its Effect on Joint Development Arrangements,” Natural Resources Lawyer,Vol.8,No.4,1980.

3.Wythe E.Braden,“Anatomy of Failure:Japan-U.S.S.R. Negotiations on Siberian Oil Development,” The Fletcher Forum,1981.

4.Quentin Michael Jones,“Mineral Resources:Tribal Development of Reservation Oil and Gas Resources through the Use of a Nontaxation-based Tribal Joint Development Program,” American Indian Law Review,Vol.9,1981.

5.C.Cook,“Filling the Gap—Delimiting the Australia-Indonesia Maritime Boundary,” Australian Year Book of International Law,1981.

6.Edward Collins,Martin A.Rogoff,“The International Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation,” Maine Law Review,Vol.34,No.1,1982.

7.K.T.Chao,“East China Sea:Boundary Problems Relating to the Tiao-Yu-Tai Islands,” Chinese Year Book,1982.

8.Paul C.Yuan,“China’s Offshore Oil Development:Legal and Geopolitical Perspectives,” Texas International Law Journal,Vol.18,No.107,1983.

9.Rainer Lagoni,“Interim Measures Pending Maritime Delimitation Agreements,” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.78,1984.

10.Daniel J.Dzurek,“Boundary and Resource Disputes in the South China Sea,” Ocean Yearbook,Vol.5,1985.

11.Paul.C.Yuan,“China’s Offshore Petroleum Resources Law,” Law and the Environment,Vol.1,No.105,1985.

12.Ying-jeou Ma,“Legal Problems of Seabed Boundary Delimitation in the East China Sea,” Journal of International Law & Trade,Vol.9,1985.

13.Mark J.Valencia,“Taming Trouble Waters:Joint Development of Oil and Mineral Resources in Overlapping Claim Areas,” San Diego Law Review,Vol.23,No.661,1986.

14.Alberto Szekely,“The International Law of Submarine Transboundary Hydrocarbon Resources:Legal Limits to Behavior and Experiences for the Gulf of Mexico,” Natural Resources Journal,Vol.26,1986.

15.G.M.Lewis,“Comment:The Joint Operating Agreement:Partnership or Not?” Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law,Vol.4,No.2,1986.

16.Paul C Yuan,“Disputes over Marine Resources in East Asia:Conflict ahead?” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law,Vol.1,1986.

17.Anthony F.Granucci,“Joint Development of Resources in Indonesia,” Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law,Vol.4,No.2,1986.

18.Albert E.Utton,Paul D. Mchugh,“On an Institutional Arrangement for Developing Oil and Gas in the Gulf of Mexico,” Natural Resources Journal,Vol.26,1986.

19.Clive R.Symmons,“The Rockall Dispute Deepens:An Analysis of Recent Danish and Icelandic Actions,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.35,1986.

20.Peter C. Reid,“Joint Development Zones between Countries,” Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Bulletin,Vol.6,1987.

21.Ernst Willheim,“Australia-Indonesia Seabed Boundary Negotiations Proposal for a Joint Development Zone in the‘Timor Gap’,” Australian International Law News,1987.

22.Paul C.Yuan,“China’s Offshore Oil Development Policy and Legislation:An Overview Analysis,” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law,1988.

23.Elliot L.Richardson,“Jan Mayen in Perspective,” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.82,1988.

24.Masahiro Miyoshi,“The Basic Concept of Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Resources on the Continental Shelf:With Special Reference to the Discussions at the East-West Center Workshop on the Southeast Asian seas,” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law,1988.

25.Ernst Willeim,“Australia-Indonesia Seabed Boundary Negotiations:Proposals for a Joint Development Zone in the‘Timor Gap’,” Natural Resources Journal,Vol.29,1989.

1.Anthony Bergin,“The Australian-Indonesian Timor Gap Maritime Boundary Agreement,” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law,1990.

2.Ted L.McDorman,“Canada and France Agree to Arbitration for the St. Pierre and Miquelon Boundary Dispute,” International Journal of Estuarine and Coastal Law,1990.

3.Jorge R.Coquia,“Maritime Boundary Problems in the South China Sea,” University of British Columbia Law Review,Vol.24,No.1,1990.

4.Kym P Livesley,“The Timor Gap Treaty— An Update,” Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Bulletin,Vol.10,No.4,1991.

5.Yu Hui,“Joint Development of Mineral Resources—An Asian Solution?” Asian Yearbook of International Law,1992.

6.Joseph J. Cusimano,“A Analysis of Iran-Iraq Bilateral Border Treaties,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law,Vol.24,No. 9,1992.

7.Blake.G.H,“International Boundary and Territorial Stability in the Middle East:An Assessment,” Geo Journal,Vol.28,1992.

8.Oladipo O. Sholanke,“Delimiting the Territorial Sea between Nigeria and Cameroun:A Rational Approach,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.42,1992.

9.S.P. Jagota,“Maritime Boundary and Joint Development Zones:Emerging Trends,” Ocean Yearbook,1993.

10.Daniel J.Dzurek,“An Analytical Model of Regional Seas Management:The Sea of Japan,” Ocean Yearbook,1993.

11.Ludwing Noel A,Valencia Mark J,“Oil and Mineral Resources of the East China Sea:Prospects in Relation to Maritime Boundaries,” Geo Journal,Vol.30,1993.

12.Ted L. McDorman,“The South China Sea Islands Dispute in the 1990s—A New Multilateral Processand Continuing Friction,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,1993.

13.Francis M. Auburn,Vivian L.Forbes,“The Timor Gap Treaty and the Law of the Sea Convention,” Ocean Yearbook,1993.

14.Jonathan I. Charney,“Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law,” American Journal of International Law,Vol.88,1994.

15.BrianK. Murphy,“Dangerous Ground:The Spratly Islands and International Law,” Ocean and Coastal Law Journal,Vol.1,1994.

16.Peter C Reid,“Filling the Gap:Recent Development in the Timor Gap,” Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Bulletin,Vol.13,No.2,1994.

17.Stuart Kaye,“The Timor Gap Treaty:Creative Solutions and International Conflict,” Sydney Law Review,Vol.16,No.72,1994.

18.Ted L. McDorman,“The Search for Resolution of the Canada-France Ocean Dispute Adjacent to St. Pierre and Miquelon,” The Dalhousie Law Journal,Vol.17,1994.

19.Jin-Hyun Paik,“The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Northeast Asian Maritime Practice,” The Korean Journal of Comparative Law,Vol.22,1994.

20.Renate Haller-Trost,“The Brunei-Malaysia Dispute over Territorial and Maritime Claims in International Law,” International Boundaries Research Unit Maritime Briefing,Vol.1,No.3,1994.

21.JonathanL Charne,“Central East Asian Maritime Boundaries and the Law of the Sea,” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.89,1995.

22.Charles Liu,“Chinese Sovereignty and Joint Development:A Pragmatic Solution to the Spratly Islands Dispute,” Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review,Vol.18,1995.

23.Thomas A. Reynolds,“Delimitation,Exploitation,and Allocation of Transboundary Oil & Gas Deposits between Nation-states,” International Law Students Association Journal of International & Comparative Law,Vol.1,1995.

24.Yu Hui,“Remarks on China’s Ratification of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” Asian Yearbook of International Law,1995.

25.Lotta Lindegren,“The Spratly Islands Case:Observations and Possible Solution,” The Finnish Yearbook of International Law,1996.

26.Ross Kamarul-Baharin,“The Spratly Islands:A General Perspective on Choices of Sovereignty,Security and Cooperative Regimes,” The Finnish Yearbook of International Law,1996.

27.Jerzy Sztucki,“Case Analysis:Case concerning Land and Maritime Boundary (Cameroon v. Nigeria):Provisional Measures,” Order of 15 March 1996,Leiden Journal of International Law,Vol.10,No.2,1997.

28.M Sornarjah,“South East Asia and International Law,” Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law,Vol.1,1997.

29.Barbara Kwiatkowska,“Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation,as Exemplified in the Work of the International Court of Justice during the Presidency of Sir Robert Yewdall Jennings and Beyond,” Ocean Development & International Law,1997,Vol.28,No.2,1997.

30.Max Herriman & Martin Tsamenyi,“The 1997 Australia-Indonesia Maritime Boundary Treaty:A Secure Legal Regime for Offshore Resource Development?” Ocean Development &International Law,Vol.29,No.4,1998.

31.David Whiting,“The Spratly Islands Dispute and the Law of the Sea,” Denver Journal of International Law & Policy,Vol.26,No.5,1998.

32.ChristopherC. Joyner,“The Spratly Islands Dispute:What Rolefor Normalizing Relations between Chinaand Taiwan?” New England Law Review,Vol.32,1998.

33.Christopher C. Joyner,“The Spratly Islands Dispute:Rethinking the Interplay of Law,Diplomacy,and Geo-politics in the South China Sea,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.13,1998.

34.Zou Keyuan,“The Establishment of a Marine Legal System in China,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.13,1998.

35.Lian A. Mito,“The Timor Gap Treaty as a Model for Joint Development in the Spratly Islands,” American University International Law Review,Vol.13,1998.

36.Zhiguo Gao,“The Legal Concept and Aspects of Joint Development in International Law,” Ocean Yearbook,Vol.13,1998.

37.AlexG. Oude Elferink,“Does Undisputed Title to a Maritime Zone Always Exclude its Delimitation:The GreyArea Issue,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.13,1998.

38.Gillian Triggs,“Timor Gap Treaty between Australia-Indonesia:Straddle Deposits Expose Legal Issues,” Lawasia Journal,1998.

39.StuartKaye,“The Use of Multiple Boundaries in Maritime Boundary Delimitation:Law and Practice,” Australian Year Book of International Law,Vol.19,1998.

40.David M. Ong,“The 1979 and 1990 Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Agreements:A Model for International Legal Cooperation in Common Offshore Petroleum Deposits?” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.14,1999.

41.Nguyen Hong Thao,“Vietnam and Joint Development in the Gulf of Thailand,” Asian Yearbook of International Law,1999.

42.Nguyen Hong Thao,“Joint Development in the Gulf of Thailand,” International Boundaries Research Unit Boundary and Security Bulletin,1999.

43.David M. Ong,“Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits:‘Mere’State Practice or Customary International Law?” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.93,No.4,1999.

44.Zou Keyuan,“Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Tonkin,” Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.30,No.3,1999.

45.Nuno Sérgio Marques Antunes,“The Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration:First Stage—The Law of Title to Territory Re-Averred,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.48,1999.

46.Masahiro Miyoshi,“The Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas in Relation to Maritime Boundary Delimitation,” International Boundaries Research Unit Maritime Briefing,Vol.2,No.5,1999.

1.Omar Saleem,“The Spratly Islands Dispute:China Defines the New Millennium,” American University International Law Review,Vol.15,No.3,2000.

2.W. Michael Reisman,“Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration (Award,Phase II:Maritime Delimitation),” The American Journal of International Law,Vol.94,2000.

3.David M. Ong,“The Legal Status of the 1989 Australia-Indonesia Timor Gap Treaty Following the End of Indonesian Rule in East Timor,” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law,Vol.31,2000.

4.Gillian Triggs,“Legal and Commercial Risk of Investment in the Timor Gap,” Melbourne Journal of International Law,Vol.1,2000.

5.Nuno Sergio Marques Antunes,“The Pending Maritime Delimitation in the Cameroon v Nigeria Case:A Piece in the Jigsaw Puzzle of the Gulf of Guinea,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.16,2000.

6.Constance Johnson,“Case Analysis:Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration,” Leiden Journal of International Law,Vol. 13,2000.

7.Tanaka Yoshifumi,“Reflections on the Eritrea/Yemen Arbitration of 17 December 1999 (Second Phase:Maritime Delimitation),” Netherlands International Law Review,Vol.48,2001.

8.Nuno Sergio Marques Antunes,“The 1999 Eritrea-Yemen Maritime Delimitation Award and the Development of International Law,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.50,2001.

9.Barbara Kwiatkowska,“The Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration:Landmark Progress in the Acquisition of Territorial Sovereignty and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation,” Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.32,No.1,2001.

10.Malcolm D. Evans,“The Maritime Delimitation between Eritrea and Yemen,” Leiden Journal of International Law,Vol. 14,2001.

11.Ab dullatif A.Alshaikh,“Saudi Arabia and Its Gulf Cooperation Council Neighbours:A Study in International Boundary Management,”2001,Durham theses,Durham University(http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1605/).

12.Tanaka Yoshifumi,“Reflections on the Concept of Proportionality in the Law of Maritime Delimitation,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.16,2001.

13.David M. Ong,“The New Timor Sea Arrangement 2001:Is Joint Development of Common Offshore:Oil and Gas Deposits Mandated under International Law?” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.17,2002.

14.GillianTriggs,Dean Bialek,“The New Timor Sea Treaty and Interim Arrangements for Joint Development of Petroleum Resources of the Timor Gap,” Melbourne Journal of International Law,Vol.3,2002.

15.John Holmes,“End the Moratorium:The Timor Gap Treaty as a Model for the Complete Resolution of the Western Gap in the Gulf of Mexico,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,Vol.35,2002.

16.Maribel B. Aguilos,“Japanese Ocean Governance:Lessons for the Philippines,” Ocean Yearboo k,Vol.16,2002.

17.Jon M. Van Dyke,“Northeast Asian Seas-Conflicts,Accomplishments and the Role of the United States,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.17,2002.

18.Gillian Triggs,“Proposed Timor Sea Arrangements between Australia and the East Timor Transitional Administration,” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law,Vol.20,2002.

19.Yoshifumi Tanaka,“Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Qatar/Bahrain Case,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.52,2003.

20.Francis N. Botchway,“The Context of Trans-Boundary Energy Resource Exploitation:The Environment,the State and the Methods,” Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy,Vol.14,2003.

21.Adaeze IFESI,“Offshore Delimitation of Resources Deposits Situated across National Boundaries,” The Journal of World Investment,Vol.4,2003.

22.Wei Cui,“Multilateral Management as a Fair Solution to the Spratly Disputes,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law,Vol.36,2003.

23.David Lerer,Kendall Freeman,“How to Negotiate and Structure a Joint Development Agreement,” Oil & Gas Journal,Vol.101,No.34,2003.

24.David Lerer,“Seven Fundamental Issues Frame JDA Negotiations,” Oil & Gas Journal,Vol.101,No.35,2003.

25.Anthony Heiser,“East Timor and the Joint Petroleum Development Area,” Australian and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal,Vol.17,2003.

26.Jon M.Van Dyke,“The Republic of Korea’s Maritime Boundaries,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.18,2003.

27.Gillian Triggs,“The Oceanic Litigation:A Judicial No-man’s in the Timor Gap,” International Energy Law & Taxation Review,Vol.6,2004.

28.Zaur Baghirov,“The Oil and Gas Projects and Settlement of Border Disputes in the Caspian Sea,” International Energy Law & Taxation Review,Vol.11,2004.

29.Yoshifumi Tanaka,“Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Cameroon/Nigeria case,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.53,2004.

30.Steven Wei Su,“The Tiaoyu Islands and Their Possible Effect on the Maritime Boundary Delimitation between China and Japan,” Chinese Journal of International Law,Vol.3,2004.

31.Christopher M Flynn,“A Broad Framework for the Exploration of South China Sea Hydrocarbon Deposits in the Context of the Trans-ASEAN Gas Pipeline,” Melbourne Journal of International Law,Vol.5,2004.

32.Gillian Triggs,“The Timor Sea Treaty and the International Unitization Agreement for Greater Sunrise:Practical Solutions in the Timor Sea,” Australian Year Book of International Law,Vol.23,2004.

33.John A. Duff,“A Note on the United States and the Law of the Sea:Looking Back and Moving Forward,” Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.35,No.3,2004.

34.Christopher M. Flynn,“Energy Security and Southeast Asia:Re-embracing Functionalism,” International Energy Law & Taxation Review,Vol.11,2005.

35.Kevin X. Li,Kevin Cullinane,Hong Yan and Jin Cheng,“Maritime Policy in China after WTO:Impacts and Implications for Foreign Investment,” Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce,Vol.36,2005.

36.Alisa Newman Hood,“Australia Adrift:The Timor Sea Oil &Gas Dispute,” the Brown Journal of World Affairs,Vol.12,2005.

37.Kristen Grover,“A Conceptual Comparison between Unitization under Australian Petroleum Legislation and Coordination under the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (QLD),” Australian Resources and Energy Law Journal,Vol.24,2005.

38.ZouKeyuan,“Implementing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in East Asia:Issues and Trends,” Singapore Year Book of International Law,Vol.9,2005.

39.Zou Keyuan,“Joint Development in the South China Sea:A New Approach,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.21,No.1,2006.

40.Tullio Scovazzi,“Maritime Delimitation Cases before International Courts and Tribunals,” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,2006.

41.Peter D Cameron,“The Rules of Engagement:Developing Cross-border Petroleum Deposits in the North Sea and the Caribbean,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.55,2006.

42.Victoria Vanburen,“The Colombia-Venezuela Maritime Boundary Case:Proposal for a Joint Development Zone in the Gulf of Venezuela,” Texas Journal of Oil,Gas and Energy Law,Vol.1,No.1,2006.

43.Chidinma Bernadine Okafor,“Joint Development:An Alternative Legal Approach to Oil and Gas Exploitationin the Nigeria-Cameroon Maritime Boundary Dispute?” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.21,2006.

44.Yuicel Acer,“A Proposal for a Joint Maritime Development Regime in the Aegean Sea,” Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce,Vol.37,No.1,2006.

45.Natalie Klein,“Provisional Measures and Provisional Arrangements in Maritime Boundary Disputes,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.21,2006.

46.Torbjrn Pedersen,“The Svalbard Continental Shelf Controversy:Legal Disputes and Political Rivalries,” Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.37,2006.

47.N.Klein,“Provisional Measures and Pprovisional Arrangements in Maritime Boundary Disputes,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law,Vol.21,2006.

48.AnaE. Bastida,Adaeze Ifesi-Okoye,Salim Mahmud,JamesRoss,and Thomas Walde,“Cross-border Unitization and Joint Development Agreements:An International Law Perspective,” Houston Journal of International Law,Vol.29,No.2,2007.

49.WendyN. Duong,“Following the Path of Oil:The Law of the Sea or Realpolitik— What Good Does Law Do in the South China Sea Territorial Conflicts?” Fordham International Law of Journal,Vol.30,2007.

50.Sheila Slocum Hollis,“Liquefied Natural Gas:‘The Big Picture’for Future Development in North Africa,” Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal,Vol.2,2007.

51.Gregory W. Bowman,“Thinking Outside the Border:Homeland Security and the Forward Deployment of the US Border,” Houston Journal of International Law,Vol.44,2007.

52.Daniel-Erasmus Khan,“Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria Case (Cameroon v Nigeria),” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,2007.

53.Tullio Scovazzi,“Maritime Boundary between Guinea-Bissau and Senegal Arbitration and Case (Guinea-Bissau v Senegal),” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,2007.

54.Malcolm N Shaw,“Title,Control,and Closure? The Experience of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.56,2007.

55.Zou Keyuan,“The Sino-Vietnamese Agreement on Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Gulf of Tonkin,” Ocean Development & International Law,Vol.36,No.1,2007.

56.Alain Piquemal,Abdelkader Lahlou,“The Intervention of the International Ocean Institution the Prevention and Settlement of Maritime Disputes,” Ocean Yearbook,Vol.21,2007.

57.Chidinma Bernadine Okafor,“Model Agreements for Joint Development:A Case Study,” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law,Vol.25,2007.

58.Zou Keyuan,“South China Sea Studies in China:Achievements,Constraints and Prospects,” Singapore Year Book of International Law11 (2007).

59.Shicun W,“Joint Development:An ad hoc Solution to the South China Sea Dispute,” China Oceans Law Review2 (2007).

60.Carlos Ramos-Mrosovsky,“International law’s Unhelpful Role in the Senkaku Islands,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law29 (2008).

61.The editorial staff of the Ocean and Coastal Law Journal,“A review of Recent Developments in Ocean and Coastal Law,” Ocean and Coastal Law Journal13 (2008).

62.Richard J. McLaughlin,“Hydrocarbon Development in the Ultra-Deepwater Boundary Region of the Gulf of Mexico:Time to Reexamine a Comprehensive U.S.-Mexico Cooperation Agreement,” Ocean Development & International Law39 (2008).

63.Gbenga Oduntan,“The Emergent Legal Regime for Exploration of Hydrocarbons in the Gulf of Guinea:Imperative Considerations for Participating States and Multinationals,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly57 (2008).

64.Gao Jianjun,“Joint Development in the East China Sea:Not an Easier Challenge than Delimitation,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 23 (2008).

65.James Manicom,“Sino-Japanese Cooperation in the East China Sea:Limitations and Prospects,” Contemporary Southeast Asia30 (2008).

66.Janet Xuanl i Liao,“Sino-Japanese Energy Security and Regional Stability:The Case of the East China Sea Gas Exploration,” East Asia25 (2008).

67.Kung-wing Au,“The East China Sea Issue:Japan-China Talks for Oil and Gas,” East Asia25 (2008).

68.Suk Kyoon Kim,“Understanding Maritime Disputes in NortheastAsia:Issues and Nature,” International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law23 (2008).

69.Yoshifumi Tanaka,Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Nicaragua/Honduras Case,2008(http://www.hjil.de/68_2008/68_2008_4_a_903_938.pdf).

70.Joshua D. Freeman,“Taming the Mekong:The Possibilities and Pitfalls of a Mekong Basin Joint Energy Development Agreement,” Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 10 (2009).

71.Betsy Baker,“International Arctic Change and the Law and Politics of the Arctic Ocean Seabed:Filling an Arctic Gap:Legal and Regulatory Possibilities for Canadian-U.S. Cooperation in the Beaufort Sea,” Vermont Law Review34 (2009).

72.Nguyen HongThao,Ramses Amer,“A New Legal Arrangement for the SouthChina Sea?” Ocean Development & International Law40 (2009).

73.Ted L.McDorman,David L VanderZwaag,American-Canadian Boundary Disputes and Cooperation,Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,2009.

74.Clive H.Schofild,Blurring the Lines:Maritime Joint Development and the Cooperative Management of Ocean Resources,2009(http://ro.uow.edu.au/lawpapers/361/).

75.Yoshifumi Tanaka,“Reflections on Maritime Delimitation in the Romania/Ukraine Case Before the International Court of Justice,” Netherlands International Law Review 56 (2009).

76.Coalter Lathrop,“The Technical Aspects of International Maritime Boundary Delimitation,Depiction,and Recovery,” Ocean Development & International Law28 (2009).

77.Yusuf Mohammad Yusuf,“Is Joint Development a Panacea for Maritime Boundary Disputes and for the Exploitation of Offshore Transboundary Petroleum Deposits?” International Energy Law Review4 (2009).

78.Alexander M. Peterson,“Sino-Japanese Cooperation in the EastChina Sea:A Lasting Arrangement?” Cornell International Law Journal42 (2009).

79.Clive Schofield and Ian Storey,The South China Sea Dispute:Increasing Stakes and Rising Tensions,The Jamestown Foundation,2009 (http://www.jamestown.org).

80.Gao Jianjun,“A Note on the 2008 Cooperation Consensus Between China and Japan in the East China Sea,” Ocean Development and International Law Journal40 (2009).

1.J. Nna Emeka Wokoro,“Beyond Petroleum Production to Community Development:International Oil Companies as Proxy Governments,” Texas Journal of Oil,Gas and Energy Law5 (2010).

2.Chukwuemeka Mike Okorie,“Have the Modern Approaches to Unit Development of Straddling Petroleum Resources Extinguished the Applicability of the Primordial Law of Capture?” Currents:International Trade Law Journal18 (2010).

3.Marika Vilisaar,“Sino-Japanese Maritime JurisdictionalDisputes in the East China Sea,” Acta Societatis Martensis4 (2010).

4.Karla Urdaneta,“Transboundary Petroleum Reservoirs:A Recommended Approach for the United States and Mexico in the Deepwaters of the Gulf of Mexico,” Houston Journal of International Law32 (2010).

5.Toby Hewitt,“An Asian Perspective on Model Oil and Gas Services Contracts,” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law28 (2010).

6.Hui Wu & Dan Zhang,“Territorial Issues on the East China Sea:A Chinese Position,” Journal of East Asia & International Law3 (2010).

7.Lilian del Castillo-Laborde,“Equitable Utilization of Shared Resources,” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,2010.

8.Robert W. Smith,“Maritime Delimitation in the South China Sea:Potentiality and Challenges,” Ocean Development & International Law41 (2010).

9.WafulaOkumu,“Resources and Border Disputes in Eastern Africa,” Journal of Eastern African Studies4 (2010).

10.Hui Wu & Dan Zhang,“Territorial Issues on the East China Sea A Chinese Position,” Journal of East Asia & International Law3 (2010).

11.Kyriaki Noussia,“On International Arbitrations for the Settlement of Boundary Maritime Delimitation Disputes and Disputes from Joint Development Agreements forthe Exploitation of Offshore Natural Resources,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law25 (2010).

12.M. Shah Alam,Abdullah Al Faruque,“The Problem of Delimitation of Bangladesh’s Maritime Boundaries with India and Myanmar:Prospects for a Solution,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law25 (2010).

13.Guo Rongxing,Territorial Disputes and Seabed Petroleum Exploitation:Some Options for the East China Sea,2010,(http://www.brookings.edu).

14.Jeffrey J. Smith,“Brunei and Malaysia Resolve Outstanding Maritime Boundary Issues,” Law of the Sea Interest Group of American Society of International Law Reports 1 (2010).

15.Miriam Grunstein,“Unitization We Stand,Divided We Fall:A Mexican Response to Karla Urdaneta’s Analysis of Transboundary Petroleum Reservoirs in the Deep Waters of the Gulf of Mexico,” Houston Journal of International Law33 (2011).

16.Robert C.Beckman & Leonardo Bernard,Disputed Areas In The South China Sea:Prospects for Arbitration or Advisory Opinion,Third International WorkshopThe South China Sea:Cooperation for Regional Security and Development,2011,(http://southchinaseastudies.org/en/datbase-on-south-china-sea-study/doc_details/275-robert-c-beckman-a-leonardo-bernard-disputed-areas-in-the-south-china-sea-prospects-for-arbitratio).

17.David M.Ong,“Joint Exploitation Areas,” Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law,2011.

18.Chijioke S. Ugwuanui,“Does the Use of Joint Development Agreements Bar International Maritime Boundaries Delimitation,” Dublin Legal Review Quarterly1 (2011).

19.Deniz Tas,“Oil and Gas in the East China Sea:Maritime Boundaries,Joint Development and the Rule of Capture,” International Energy Law Review2 (2011).

20.Michael Sheng-tiGau,“Problems and Practices in Maritime Delimitation in East Asia:With Special Reference to Taiwan,” Journal of East Asia & International Law4 (2011).

21.Yusuf Mohammad Yusuf,“The Role of the 1982 UNCLOS in the Resolution of Maritime Boundary Disputes,” International Energy Law Review7 (2011).

22.Peter Ripley,“Unlocking Oil and Gas Reserves in the Arctic Ocean:Is there a Conventional Solution to Delimitation of the Maritime Boundaries?” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law29 (2011).

23.Koji Furukawa,“Bordering Japan:Towards a Comprehensive Perspective,” Journal of Borderlands Studies26 (2011).

24.Jesse SalahOvadia,“The Dual Nature of Local Content in Angola’s Oil and Gas Industry:Development vs. Elite Accumulation,” Journal of Contemporary African Studies30 (2012).

25.Mary George,“Adequacy of National Laws for Malaysian Ocean Governance for the Next Decade,” International Journal of Legal Information40 (2012).

26.Guifang (Julia) Xue,“Deep Danger Intensified Competition in the South China Sea and Implication for China,” Ocean and Coastal Law Journal17 (2012).

27.J.L. Loftis,T.J. Tyler and E.E. Hawker,Gaps in the Ice:Maritime Boundaries and Hydrocarb on Field Development in the Arctic,2012,(www.ogel.org).

28.Zou Keyuan,Historic Rights and Joint Development,the International Conference on “Recent Development of the South China Sea Dispute and Prospects of Joint Development Regime”,2012.

29.Cecilia A.Low,“Marine Environmental Protection in Joint Development Agreements,” Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law30 (2012).

30.Hong Thao Nguyen,“Maritime and Territorial Dispute in the South China Sea:Vietnam’s Position on the Sovereignty Over the Paracels & the Spratlys:Its Maritime Claims,” Journal of East Asia & International Law5 (2012).

31.Clive Schofield,“Claims to Maritime Jurisdiction and the Division of Ocean Space,” Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs(2012).

32.Julia Lisztwan,“Stability of Maritime Boundary Agreements,” The Yale Journal of International Law37 (2012).

33.Suk Kyoon Kim,“China and Japan Maritime Disputes in the East China Sea:A Note on Recent Developments,” Ocean Development & International Law43 (2012).

34.James S. Baker & MichaelByers,“Crossed Lines:The Curious Case of the Beaufort Sea Maritime Boundary Dispute,” Ocean Development & International Law43 (2012).

35.Clive Schofield,Defining Areas for Joint Development in Disputed Waters,The International Conference on “Recent Development of the South China Sea Dispute and Prospects of Joint Development Regime”,2012.

36.Leszek Buszynski,“The South China Sea:Oil,Maritime Claims,and U.S.-China Strategic Rivalry,” The Washington Quarterly35 (2012).

37.Junwu Pan,“Territorial Dispute Between China and Vietnam in the South China Sea:A Chinese Lawyer’s Perspective,” Journal of East Asia & International Law5 (2012).

38.Jorge A. Vargas,“The 2012 U.S.-Mexico Agreement onTransboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirsin the Gulf of Mexico:A Blueprint or Progress or a Recipe for Conflict?” San Diego International Law Journal14 (2012).

39.Noriko Yodogawa,“Alexander M. Peterson,An opportunity for Progress:China,Central Asia,and the Energy Charter Treaty,” Texas Journal of Oil,Gas,and Energy Law8 (2013).

40.Paul Michael Blyschak,“Offshore oil and Gas Projects Amid Maritime Border Disputes:Applicable Law,” Journal of World Energy Law and Business(2013).

41.Pablo Ferrante & Fernando Alonso-De Florida,“Framework Agreements for the Unitization of Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs:The Experience in Latin America,” International Mining and Oil & Gas Law,Development,and Investment(2013).

42.Leonardo Bernard,Prospect for Joint Development in the South China Sea,the “Managing Tensions in the South China Sea” conference,2013,(http://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Bernard-CSIS-Draft-1-June-2013-Prospect-for-Joint-Development-in-the-SCS.pdf).

43.Robert Beckman,“The South China Sea:the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea,” American Journal of International Law107 (2013).

44.Chisako T. Masuo,“Governing a Troubled Relationship:Can the Field of Fisheries Breed Sino-Japanese Cooperation?” Japanese Journal of Political Science14 (2013).

45.Bjarni Már Magnússon,“Outer Continental Shelf Boundary Agreements,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly62 (2013).

46.Fu,K. C,“Safeguarding China’s National Interests in the South China Sea:Rectification,Services,Leadership,and Maritime Delimitation,” China Oceans Law Review17 (2013).

47.S.Lee & Park Y. K.,Maritime Delimitation and Joint Resource Development in the East China Sea,In Securing the Ocean for the Next Generation,Papers from the Law of the Sea Institute,UC Berkeley-Korean Institute of Ocean Science and Technology Conference,2013,(http://www.law.berkeley.edu/files/Lee-Park-final.pdf).

48.J. Ashley Roach,“Today’s Customary International Law of the Sea,” Ocean Development & International Law45 (2014).

49.Ramses Amer,“China,Vietnam,and the South China Sea:Disputes and Dispute Management,” Ocean Development & International Law 45 (2014).

50.Yu Mincai,“China’s Responses to the Compulsory Arbitration on the South China Sea Dispute:Legal Effects and Policy Options,” Ocean Development & International Law45 (2014).

51.Zewei Yang,“Building the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road:Its Impact on the Peaceful Use of the South China Sea,” China and WTO Review 2(2016).

1.蔡鹏鸿:《争议海域共同开发的管理模式:比较研究》,上海社会科学院出版社,1998。

2.余民才:《海洋石油勘探与开发的法律问题》,中国人民大学出版社,2001。

3.傅崐成:《海洋法专题研究》,厦门大学出版社,2004。

4.高健军:《中国与国际海洋法:纪念〈联合国海洋法公约〉生效10周年》,海洋出版社,2004。

5.高之国、贾宇、张海文主编《国际海洋法的新发展》,海洋出版社,2005。

6.高之国、贾宇、张海文主编《国际海洋法的理论与实践》,海洋出版社,2006。

7.萧建国:《国际海洋边界石油的共同开发》,海洋出版社,2006。

8.高之国、贾宇、张海文主编《国际海洋法发展趋势研究》,海洋出版社,2007。

9.李允武主编《海洋能源开发》,海洋出版社,2008。

10.国家海洋局海洋发展战略研究所课题组编《中国海洋发展报告(2013)》,海洋出版社,2013。

11.杨泽伟主编《海上共同开发协定汇编(汉英对照)》(上下册),社会科学文献出版社,2016。

1.蔡鹏鸿:《共同开发有争议海域之思考》,《战略与管理》1994年第5期。

2.林忠:《中国与共同开发的学术探讨》,《现代法学》1998年第1期。

3.周忠海:《论南中国海共同开发的法律问题》,《厦门大学法律评论》2003年第2期。

4.金永明:《论东海大陆架划界争议与共同开发》,《贵州大学学报》(社会科学版)2006年第4期。

5.余民才:《论中日东海油气争端的共同开发解决方案》,《法学杂志》2006年第4期。

6.何力:《东海油气资源开发的法律问题——日本的动向与我国的对策》,《上海财经大学学报》2007年第3期。

7.金永明:《论东海问题与共同开发》,《社会科学》2007年第6期。

8.贾宇:《中日东海共同开发的问题与前瞻》,《世界经济与政治论坛》2007年第4期。

9.蔡鹏鸿:《中日东海争议现状与共同开发前景》,《现代国际关系》2008年第3期。

10.范晓婷:《对南海“共同开发”问题的现实思考》,《海洋开发与管理》2008年第4期。

11.李国选:《南海共同开发制度化:内涵、条件与制约因素》,《南洋问题研究》2008年第1期。

12.石莉:《国际实践中的海域划界与共同开发的替代和共存模式》,《太平洋学报》2010年第4期。

13.杨泽伟:《“搁置争议、共同开发”原则的困境与出路》,《江苏大学学报》(社会科学版)2011年第3期。

14.安应民:《论南海争议区域油气资源共同开发的模式选择》,《当代亚太》2011年第6期。

15.邵建平:《如何推进南海共同开发?——东南亚国家经验的视角》,《当代亚太》2011年第6期。

16.何苗:《南沙群岛海域油气资源共同开发的现实分析》,《学术探索》2011年第4期。

17.罗国强:《理解南海共同开发与航行自由问题的新思路——基于国际法视角看南海争端的解决路径》,《当代亚太》2012年第3期。

18.许浩:《南海争议区油气资源共同开发的战略构想》,《太平洋学报》2012年第9期。

19.温耀原:《国际法视野下共同开发南海的法律问题研究》,《法学杂志》2012年第10期。

20.杨泽伟:《论〈海洋法公约〉解决南海争端的非适用性》,《法学杂志》2012年第10期。

21.黄伟:《2012年中海油发布南海油气对外招标公告的法律问题研究》,《法学杂志》2012年第10期。

22.张丽娜:《南海油气资源共同开发的主体适格性》,《法学杂志》2012年第11期。

23.蒋帅:《中日东海大陆架油气资源开发争端解决的新思路》,《日本研究》2013年第1期。

24.杨泽伟:《论海上共同开发的发展趋势》,《东方法学》2014年第3期。

25.杨泽伟:《论海上共同开发“区块”的选择问题》,《时代法学》2014年第3期。

26.杨泽伟:《论海上共同开发区的法律适用问题》,《广西大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)2015年第4期。

1.中华人民共和国外交部网站:http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/。

2.中国海洋石油总公司网站:http://en.cnooc.com.cn/。

3.美国国务院网站:http://www.state.gov/。

4.菲律宾外交部网站:http://www.dfa.gov.ph/。

5.越南外交部网站:http://www.mofa.gov.vn/en。

6.越南外交学院网站:http://dav.academia.edu/。

7.越南律师协会网站:http://www.hoiluatgiavn.org.vn/。

8.越南国家石油公司网站:http://english.pvn.vn/。

9.马来西亚外交部网站:http://www.kln.gov.my/。

10.马来西亚国家石油公司网站:http://www.petronas.com.my/。

11.文莱外交和贸易部网站:http://www.mofat.gov.bn/。

12.印度尼西亚外交部网站:http://www.deplu.go.id/。

13.东南亚法学会网站:http://www.aseanlawassociation.org/。

14.新加坡国立大学国际法研究中心网站:http://cil.nus.edu.sg/。

15.澳大利亚外交和贸易部网站:http://www.dfat.gov.au/。

16.东帝汶政府网站:http://timor-leste.gov.tl/。

17.国际战略研究中心网站:http://csis.org/。

18.国际法院网站:http://www.icj-cij.org/。

19.国际海洋法法庭网站:https://www.itlos.org/。