篇章数

27

引证文献

0 !

参考文献

198

文化研究(第16辑)图书

Culture Studies Vol.16

SSAPID:101-5788-2532-92
ISBN:978-7-5097-5921-9
DOI:
ISSN:

[内容简介] 本辑《文化研究》共推出了六个单元,既有当代中国文化问题的讨论,也有西方前沿理论的译介。其中,“学术话语的文化研究”专题着重于讨论当代知识生产中话语问题;“空间阅读”专题围绕着近些年来十分流行的空间研究主题展开;“跨文化研究”专题聚焦于自我与他者的复杂交错关系上;“数字人文”专题反映了技术革命对古老的人文学科诸多方面的深刻影响。

相关信息

丛书名:
作 者: 周宪 陶东风
编 辑:刘丹
出版社:社会科学文献出版社
出版时间: 2014年06月
语 种:中文
中图分类:G0 文化理论

 主编的话

 专题一 学术话语的文化研究

  主持人语

  种族身份与种族话语之悖论

  从术语的互文看女性主义批评的困境与突围*

  南大洋的海岸Worlds of Difference,eds. Said Amir Arjomand and Elisa P. Reis,SAGE Publications Ltd.,2013。译者已获得出版社以及作者本人授权,特别为本栏目翻译此文。">*

   导言 理解差异

   南方层级(the southern tier)

   构建澳大利亚的现代性:殖民地的意义

   现代主义转向和关于地点的协商

   关于社会学之现代性的几点看法

  趣味与日常生活

  何为身份认同研究?

   身份认同研究兴起的历史背景

   身份认同:实质还是建构?

   身份认同:精神还是社会?

   结语

 专题二 跨文化研究

  主持人语

  东西方文化生成过程的侨易视域

   作为侨易学元思维的“侨易二元”

   西方文化生成过程的侨易学分析

   东方文化生成过程的侨易学视域

  从文学形象到文化想象的转换机制

   文学审美形象的多义性

   作者的思想观念对转换的引导

   社会意识形态对转换的调控

  有关跨文化形象学论争的反思

   跨文化形象学研究的方法、对象和问题

   跨文化形象学研究的现状

   指向中国主体思想构建的跨文化形象学研究的论辩

   结论

 专题三 空间阅读

  主持人语

  空间与城市*

   社会空间

   空间和地方

   城市的空间迁徙

   公共空间的私人化

  福尔摩斯在纽约

   纽约、伦敦,中心在哪?

   华生,助手还是搭档?

   性别与种族,不经意间的和解

   小结

  耽美小说和女性阅读空间

   何为耽美小说?

   耽美文本在异性恋标准下的自我规训

   耽美小说的女性阅读空间

  康德美学中国阅读的空间演进*

   救世与文化

   政治与译述

   实践与理论

   结语

 专题四 数字人文

  主持人语

  人文计算的历史A Companion to Digital Humanities,ed. Susan Schreibman,Ray Siemens,John Unsworth,Oxford:Blackwell,2004),在线版本为:http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/。">*

   导论

   起始:从1949年到1970年代

   联合:从1970年代到1980年代中期

   新的发展:从1980年代中期到1990年代早期

   互联网时代:从1990年代早期到现在

   结论

  人文学科,数字化Debates in the digital humanities,edited by Matthew K. Gold,Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,2012);该文曾发表在《高等教育纪事报》(2011年5月8日),http://chronicle.com/article/The-Humanities-Done-Digitally/127382/。">*

  数字人文及其不朽*

  历史与争论

   历史变化:数字人文定义

   多元混杂:数字人文实践者

   危机突破:数字人文的出现

   开放、协作与多元创新:数字人文的价值

 台湾来稿

  西橘本无种,逾淮别有类:台湾文学与现代性的斡旋

   前言

   纠缠的家族罗曼史:布尔乔亚、马克思、美学

   海陆分途而前功尽废:台湾现代性的前史

   亦商亦盗、亦侠亦儒:台湾现代性的起源

   试图突破封锁线:日据早期文学与殖民现代性的挣扎

   帝都风尚的诱惑:1930年代的美学现代性瞬间

   虚与委蛇、学舌反制:二战末期与皇民现代性的周旋

   错误的美丽:战后的现代主义

   乡土何在:1970年代左翼现代性的反扑

   真假“反现代性”:本土论与后现代

   在地智慧之必要:现代性的“另类化”

  观看的层次:视觉文化、视觉社会学与视觉方法批判

   前言

   当代与台湾视觉文化研究

   视觉社会学:社会学的视觉关照

   视觉方法论批判

    (一)社会研究的“观”点及其“盲”点

    (二)从表面到内里——层次解读策略

    (三)非深度分析

   结论

 其他

  论大众传媒时代的审美与日常生活*

   一

   二

   三

   四

  福特制、电子媒介与现代性*

   福特制的特点

   福特制与电子媒介的普及

   电子媒介与福特制的葬礼

   “流动的现代性”与福特制的幽灵

  艺术之死与大众文化间的张力

   闯入与过度闯入的艺术

   自恋艺术家的自杀

   不能“安息”的经典艺术作品

   无限重生的艺术

   结语

  政治图像的艺术空间与视觉语言

   引言

   宣传画《毛主席万岁》创作及其后

   “文革”前后的不同解读与阐释

   “十七年”文艺路线再审视

   政治图像的功能与表达方式

   结论

  身体是权力斗争的据点*

   一

   二

   三

   四

 《文化研究》编委会

《文化研究》第16辑在全球化和本土化的双重语境交错中,继续文化研究领域的诸多新锐话题。“学术话语的文化研究”专题,聚焦于当代知识生产中的话语形成,考察文化研究中若干重要话语的发展和嬗变,以及其后的文化意义。“空间阅读”专题,着力于空间研究,从文学、社会和文化等多重角度入手,探讨空间与社会文化之间“相互建构”的复杂关联。“跨文化研究”专题,以自我与他者关系为主题,努力探索如何避免“二元对立”的陈旧道路,进而在交互关系中发掘“他者”的智慧与经验。“数字人文”专题,直接切入当前国际学术前沿,描绘出技术对人文学科研究的深刻影响,提出一系列数字技术冲击下人文学科新的问题和发展理路。“台湾来稿”两篇,分别论述“台湾文学现代性”和视觉文化中的“观看”。另有学界新锐的专题论文5篇,分别讨论了若干值得关注的文化研究问题。

Bearman,D.,(ed.)(1996). Research Agenda for Networked Cultural Heritage. Santa Monica,CA:Getty Art History Information Program.

Berry-Rogghe,G. L. M. and T. D. Crawford(1973). Developing a Machine-independent Concordance Program for a Variety of Languages. In A. J. Aitken,R. W. Bailey,and N. Hamilton-Smith(eds.),The Computer and Literary Studies(pp.309-316). Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.

Bessinger,J. B. and S. M. Parrish(1965). Literary Data Processing Conference Proceedings. White Plains,NY:IBM.

Bornstein,G. and T. Tinkle(1998). The Iconic Page in Manuscript,Print,and Digital Culture. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.

Brown,S.,S. Fisher,P. Clements,K. Binhammer,T. Butler,K. Carter,I. Grundy,and S. Hockey(1997). SGML and the Orlando Project:Descriptive Markup for an Electronic History of Women’s Writing. Computers and the Humanities 31:271–84.

Brunner,T. F.(1993). Classics and the Computer:The History of a Relationship. In J. Solomon(ed.),Accessing Antiquity:The Computerization of Classical Studies(pp.10–33). Tucson:University of Arizona Press.

Burnard,L.(1987a). CAFS:A New Solution to an Old Problem. Literary and Linguistic Computing 2:7–12.

Burnard,L.(1987b). Principles of Database Design. In S. Rahtz(ed.),Information Technology in the Humanities(pp.54–68). Chichester:Ellis Horwood.

Burnard,L.(1988). Report of Workshop on Text Encoding Guidelines. Literary and Linguistic Computing 3:131–3.

Burton,D. M.(1981a). Automated Concordances and Word Indexes:The Fifties. Computers and the Humanities15:1–14.

Burton,D. M.(1981b). Automated Concordances and Word Indexes:The Early Sixties and the Early Centers. Computers and the Humanities 15:83–100.

Burton,D. M.(1981c). Automated Concordances and Word Indexes:The Process,the Programs,and the Products. Computers and the Humanities 15:139-154.

Burton,D. M.(1982). Automated Concordances and Word Indexes:Machine Decisions and Editorial Revisions. Computers and the Humanities 16:195–218.

Busa,R.(1974-). Index Thomisticus. Stuttgart:Frommann-Holzboog.

Busa,R.(1980). The Annals of Humanities Computing:The Index Thomisticus. Computers and the Humanities14:83–90.

Busa,R.,(ed.)(1992). Thomae Aquinatis Opera Omnia Cum Hypertextibus in CD-ROM. Milano:Editoria Elettronica Editel.

Busa,R.(1999). Picture a Man.… Busa Award Lecture,Debrecen,Hungary,July 6,1998. Literary and Linguistic Computing 14:5–9.

Calzolari,N. and A. Zampolli(1991). Lexical Databases and Textual Corpora:A Trend of Convergence between Computational Linguistics and Literary and Linguistic Computing. In S. Hockey,N. Ide,and I. Lancashire(eds.),Research in Humanities Computing 1:Selected Papers from the ALLC/ACH Conference,Toronto,June 1989(pp.272–307). Oxford:Clarendon Press.

Conner,P. W(1991). The Beowulf Workstation:One Model of Computer-assisted Literary Pedagogy. Literary and Linguistic Computing 6:50–8.

Conner,P. W(1992). Networking in the Humanities:Lessons from Ansaxnet. Computers and the Humanities 26:195–204.

De Tollenaere,F.(1973). The Problem of the Context in Computer-aided Lexicography. In A. J. Aitken,R. W. Bailey,and N. Hamilton-Smith(eds.),The Computer and Literary Studies(pp.25–35). Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.

Ellegard,A.(1962). A Statistical Method for Determining Authorship:The Junius Letters 1769–1772. Gothenburg:Gothenburg Studies in English.

Finneran,R. J.(1996). The Literary Text in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.

Gorcy,G.(1983). L’informatique et la mise en oeuvre du trésor de la langue fran?aise(TLF),dictionnaire de la langue du 19e et du 20e siècle(1789–1960). In A. Cappelli and A. Zampolli(eds.),The Possibilities and Limits of the Computer in Producing and Publishing Dictionaries:Proceedings of the European Science Foundation Workshop,Pisa 1981. Linguistica Computazionale III(pp.119–44). Pisa:Giardini.

Hamilton-Smith,N.(1971). A Versatile Concordance Program for a Textual Archive. In R. A. Wisbey(ed.),The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Research(pp.235–44). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Healey,A.(1989). The Corpus of the Dictionary of Old English:Its Delimitation,Compilation and Application. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford,September,1989.

Hockey,S.(1986). Workshop on Teaching Computers and the Humanities Courses. Literary and Linguistic Computing 1:228–9.

Hockey,S. and I. Marriott(1979a). The Oxford Concordance Project(OCP)– Part 1. ALLC Bulletin 7:35–43.

Hockey,S. and I. Marriott(1979b). The Oxford Concordance Project(OCP)– Part 2. ALLC Bulletin 7:155–64.

Hockey,S. and I. Marriott(1979c). The Oxford Concordance Project(OCP)– Part 3. ALLC Bulletin 7:268–75.

Hockey,S. and I. Marriott(1980). The Oxford Concordance Project(OCP)– Part 4. ALLC Bulletin 8:28–35.

Holmes,D. I. and R. S. Forsyth(1995). The Federalist Revisited:New Directions in Authorship Attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing 10:111–27.

Kiernan,K. S.(1991). Digital Image Processing and the Beowulf Manuscript. Literary and Linguistic Computing6:20–7.

Lancashire,I.,(ed.)(1991). The Humanities Computing Yearbook 1989–90:A Comprehensive Guide to Software and Other Resources. Oxford:Clarendon Press.

Lancashire,I. and W. McCarty,(eds.)(1988). The Humanities Computing Yearbook 1988. Oxford:Clarendon Press.

Leningrad Codex Markup Project(2000). Project “EL”:The XML Leningrad Codex. Available at:<http://www.leningradensis.org>,accessed May 15,2003.

Lord,R. D.(1958). Studies in the History of Probability and Statistics:viii. de Morgan and the Statistical Study of Literary Style. Biometrika 45:282.

McCarty,W.(1992). Humanist:Lessons from a Global Electronic Seminar. Computers and the Humanities 26:205–22.

Mendenhall,T. C.(1901). A Mechanical Solution of a Literary Problem. The Popular Science Monthly 60:97–105.

Morton,A. Q.(1965). The Authorship of the Pauline Epistles:A Scientific Solution. Saskatoon:University of Saskatchewan.

Morton,A. Q. and Winspear,A. D.(1971). It’s Greek to the Computer. Montreal:Harvest House.

Mosteller,F. and D. L. Wallace(1964). Inference and Disputed Authorship:The Federalist. Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley.

Neuman,M.,M. Keeler,C. Kloesel,J. Ransdell,and A. Renear(1992). The Pilot Project of the Electronic Peirce Consortium(abstract). ALLC-ACH92 Conference Abstracts and Program(pp.25–7). Oxford.

Parrish,S. M.(1962). Problems in the Making of Computer Concordances. Studies in Bibliography 15:1–14.

Price-Wilkin,J.(1994). Using the World Wide Web to Deliver Complex Electronic Documents:Implications for Libraries. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review 5:5–21.<http://jpw.umdl.umich.edu/pubs/yale.html>,accessed July 21,2004.

Proud,J. K.(1989). The Oxford Text Archive. London:British Library Research and Development Report.

Robey,D.(2002). New Directions in Humanities Computing,<http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/zdv/zrkinfo/pics/aca4.htm>,accessed May 15,2003.

Robinson,P.,(ed.)(1996). Geoffrey Chaucer:The Wife of Bath’s Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Robinson,P. M. W.(1997). New Directions in Critical Editing. In K. Sutherland(ed.),Electronic Text:Investigations in Method and Theory(pp.145–71). Oxford:Clarendon Press.

Robinson,P. M. W.(1999). New Methods of Editing,Exploring and Reading The Canterbury Tales.http://www.cta.dmu.ac.uk/projects/ctp/desc2.html,accessed May 14,2003.

Russell,D. B.(1967). COCOA—A Word Count and Concordance Generator for Atlas. Chilton:Atlas Computer Laboratory.

Rydberg-Cox,J. A.(2000). Co-occurrence Patterns and Lexical Acquisition in Ancient Greek Texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing 15:121–30.

Text Encoding Initiative(2001). Text Encoding Initiative,http://www.tei-c.org,accessed May 15,2003.

Tweedie,F. J.,S. Singh,and D. I. Holmes(1996). Neural Network Applications in Stylometry:The Federalist Papers. Computers and the Humanities 30:1–10.

Wisbey,R.(1963). The Analysis of Middle High German Texts by Computer:Some Lexicographical Aspects. Transactions of the Philological Society,28–48.

Wisbey,R. A.,(ed.)(1971). The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Research. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Zweig,R. W.(1998). Lessons from the Palestine Post Project. Literary and Linguistic Computing 13:89–97.

陈芳明:《殖民地摩登:现代性与台湾史观》,麦田出版社,2004。

陈尚胜:《“怀夷”与“抑商”:明代海洋力量兴衰硏究》,山东人民出版社,1997。

陈淑容:《一九三〇年代乡土文学:台湾话文论争及其余波》,台南师范学院乡土文化研究所硕士论文,2001。

戴裔煊:《明代嘉隆间的倭寇海盗与中国资本主义的萌芽》,中国社会科学出版社,1982。

董国炎:《明清小说思潮》,山西人民出版社,2004。

黄建铭:《日治时期杨炽昌及其文学研究》,台南市立图书馆。

康来新:《发迹变泰——宋人小说学论稿》,大安出版社,1996。

廖咸浩:《“台语文学”的商榷:其理论的盲点与囿限》,《台大评论》1989年第2期。

廖咸浩:《秘密克与明你祖之间:台湾现代小说与后殖民论述》,收入陈义芝编《台湾现代小说史综论》,联经出版社,1997、1998。

廖咸浩:《离散与聚焦之间:八十年代的后现代诗与本土诗》,《台湾现代诗史论》,文讯出版社,1996。

廖咸浩:《导言:一种后台湾文学的可能》,何寄澎编《文化、认同、社会变迁:战后五十年台湾文学国际学术研讨会论文集》,台湾大学出版社,2000。

廖咸浩:《现代性崇拜与认同迷思》,杨淑芬编《面对公与义——建构宏观、包容与分享的社会》,时报出版社,2004。

林仁川:《明末清初私人海上贸易》,新华书店,1987。

刘进庆:《序论台湾近代化问题——晚清洋务近代化日据殖民近代化之评比》,《台湾殖民地史学术研讨会论文集》,海峡学术出版社,2004。

任访秋:《中国新文学渊源》,河南人民出版社,1986。

施淑:《书斋、城市与乡村——日据时代的左翼文学运动及小说中的左翼知识分子》,《两岸文学论集》,新地出版社,1997。

藤井省三:《台湾文学这一百年》,张季琳译,麦田出版社,2004。

王德威:《五十年代反共小说新论:一种逝去的文学?》,《如何现代,怎样文学:十九、二十世纪中文小说新论》,麦田出版社,1998。

温振华:《清代台湾汉人的企业精神》,《台湾师大历史学报》1981年第9期。

吴震:《十六世纪中国儒学思想的近代意涵——以日本学者岛田虔次、沟口雄三的相关讨论为中心》,《台湾东亚文明研究学刊》2004年第1期。

奚密:《早期〈笠〉诗刊探析》,《文化、认同、社会变迁:战后五十年台湾文学国际学术研讨会论文集》,台湾大学出版社,2000。

星名宏修《“大东亚共荣圈”的台湾作家(一)——陈火泉之“皇民文学”型态》,黄英哲编、涂翠花译《台湾文学研究在日本》,前卫出版社,1994。

许涤新、吴承明编《中国资本主义发展史:第一卷·中国资本主义的萌芽》,人民出版社,2003。

曾巧云:《未完成进行式:战前、战后的皇民文学论争/述》,台湾成功大学台湾文学硏究所硕士论文,2005。

张诵圣:《试谈几个研究“东亚现代主义文学”的新框架——以台湾为例》,《台湾文学研究集刊》2009年第五期。

赵勋达:《台湾新文学:1935-1937》,台南市立图书馆。

郑家建:《中国文学现代性的起源语境》,三联书店,2002。

钟美芳:《日据时代栎社之研究》(上),《台北文献》直字78,1986。

钟美芳:《日据时代栎社之研究》(下),《台北文献》直字79,1987。

周宪文:《清代台湾经济史》,台北:台湾银行经济研究室,1957。

Abu-Lughod,Janet L. 1989. Before European Hegemony:The World System A.D. 1250-1350. New York:Oxford University Press.

Antle,Martine.2006. “Surrealism and the Orient,” Ed. Katharine Conley and Pierre Taminiaux. Surrealism and Its Others. Yale University Press. pp.4-16.

Azim,Firdous. 1993. The Colonial Rise of the Novel. London:Routledge.

Barlow,Tani E. Ed. 1997. Formations of Colonial Modernity in East Asia. Durham:Duke University Press.

Baudelaire,Charles. 1997. The Parisian Prowler:Le Spleen de Paris,Petits Poemes en Prose,Trans. Edward K. Kaplan. Athens:University of Georgia Press.

Baudelaire,Charles.〔1986〕,c1964. The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays. New York,N.Y:Da Capo Press.

Beck,Ulrich Anthony Giddens,and Scott Lash. 1994. Reflexive Modernization:Politics,Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford:Stanford University Press.

Benjamin,Walter. 1929. “Surrealism:The Last Snapshot of the European Intelligentsia.” in Reflections,179.

Oxford & New York:Oxford University Press.

Bernstein,J. M. 1992. The Fate of Art. Cambridge,U.K.:Polity P.

Brook,Timothy. 1998. The Confusions of Pleasure:Commerce and Culture in Ming China. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Burchell,Graham,Gordon,Colin and Miller,Peter. Ed. 1991. The Foucault Effect:Studies in Governmentality. London:Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Burger,Peter.1984. The Theory of the Avant-garde. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

Calinescu,Mateo.1987. Five Faces of Modernity. Durham:Duke University Press.

Chakrabarty,Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe:Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Chang,Sung-sheng Yvonne. 1993. Modernism and the Nativist Resistance:Contemporary Chinese Fiction from Taiwan. Durham & London:Duke University Press.

Chang,Sung-sheng Yvonne. 2000. “Beyond Cultural and National Identities:Current Re-evaluation of the Kominka Literature from Taiwan’s Japanese Period.” Ed. Rey Chow. Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory:Reimagining a Field. Durham,N.C.:Duke University Press,99-126.

Chang,Sung-sheng Yvonne. 2004. Literary Culture in Taiwan:Martial Law to Market Law. New York:Columbia University Press.

Chatterjee,Partha. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World:A Derivative Discourse. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

Ching,Leo T. S. 2001. Becoming “Japanese”:Colonial Taiwan and the Politics of Identity Formation. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Cohn,Bernard. 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge. Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Cooper,Robert L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change. New York:Cambridge University Press.

Dirlik,Arif. 2000. “Reading Ashis Nandy:The Return of the Past;or Modernity with a Vengeance.” Ed. Vinay Lal. Dissenting Knowledges,Open Futures:The Multiple Selves and Strange Destinations of Ashis Nandy. New delhi:Oxford University Press. 260-86.

Dussel,Enrique. 1998.“The World-System and the Limits of Modernity.” The Cultures of Globalization. Ed. Frederic Jameson & Masao Miyoshi. Durham:Duke University Press.3-31.

Dussel,Enrique. 2002. “World-system and ‘Trans’-modernity” Nepantla:Views from the South. 3(2):221-244.

Eagleton,Terry. 1990. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.

Fanon,Frantz. 2004. The Wretch of the Earth. New York:Grove Press.

Feenberg,Andrew. 1995. Alternative Modernity:The Technological Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Frank,Andre Gunder. 1998. ReORIENT:Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley,Los Angeles,London:University of California Press.

Gaonkar,Dilip Parameshwar. 2001. “On Alternative Modernities.” Ed. Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar. Alternative Modernities. Durham:Duke University Press. 1-9.

Gay,Peter. 1985. The Bourgeois Experience:Victoria to Freud. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Gilroy,Paul.1993. The Black Atlantic:Modernity and Double-Consciousness. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.

Gluck,Mary. 2000. “Theorizing the Cultural Roots of the Bohemian Artist”. Modernism/modernity. 7(3):351-378.

Hanoosh,Michele. 1992. Baudelaire and Caricature:from the Comic to an Art of Modernity. University Park,Pa:Pennsylvania State University Press.

Hinsch,Bret. 1990. Passions of the cut sleeve:the male homosexual tradition in China. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Hsiau,A-chin. 2000. Contemporary Taiwanese Cultural Nationalism. London & New York:Routledge.

Jauss,Hans Robert. 1988-1989. “The Literary Process of Modernism From Rousseau to Adorno.” Cultural Critique 11. 27-61.

Liao,Hsien-hao. 1996. Poetics of Meaninglessness.

Liao,Hsien-hao.2000. “Becoming Cyborgian:Postmodernism and Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan” Postmodernism and China Ed. Arif Dirlik & Xudong Zhang(Duke UP). 175-202.

Liao,Hsien-hao. 2001. “May Fourth,Modernity,and Colonialism” Presented at the Conference on “Re-thinking Chinese Civilization in the 21th Century”(Stanford University).

Liao,Hsien-hao. 2004. “Forward to Globalization:Identity,Modernity and Nativism in Contemporary Taiwan” Cultural Dilemmas in Transitions:Central Europe versus Taiwan Conference Warsaw 2000. Eds. Ying-hsiung Chou et al. Munster:Lit Verlag. 121-140.

Lee,Leo Ou-fan. 1999. Shanghai Modern:The Flowering of a New Urban Culture in China,1930-1945. Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press.

Marx,Karl and Engels,Friedrich. 1967. The Manisfesto of the Communist Party. Trans. Samuel Moore. Intro. A. J. P. Taylor. Harmondsworth:penguin.

Outram,Dorinda. 1995. The Enlightenment. Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.

Parrinder,Patrick. 2006. Nation & Novel:The English Novel from Its Origins to the Present Day. Oxford & New York:Oxford University Press.

Poggioli,Renato. 1968. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Trans. Gerald Fitzgerald. Cambridge:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Pomeranz,Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence:China,Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Porter,Roy. 1990. The Enlightenment. London:Macmillan.

Schlossman,Beryl. 1991. The Orient of Style:Modernist Allegories of Conversion. Durham,NC:Duke University Press.

Schulte-Sasse,Jochen. 1984. “Forward:Theory of Modernism versus Theory of the Avant-garde.” Peter Burger. The Theory of the Avant-garde. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

Shapiro,Theda. 1976. Painters and Politics:The European Avant-Garde and Society,1900-1925. New York:Elsevier.

Shih,Shu-mei. The Lure of the Modern:Writing Modernism in Semicolonial China,1917-1937. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Shin,Gi-Wook and Robinson,Michael. Eds. 1999. Colonial Modernity in Korea (Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Asia Center.

Simons,Julia. 2005. “Rousseau and Aesthetic Modernity:Music’s Power of Redemption.” Eighteen Century Music 2/1. 41-56.

Taylor,Charles.2001.“Two Theories of Modernity.” Ed. Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar. Alternative Modernities. Durham:Duke University Press. 172-96.

Wagner,Peter. 1994. A Sociology of Modernity,London & New York:Routledge.

Wang,David Der-wei. 1997. Fin-de-siecle Splendor:Repressed Modernities of Late Qing Fiction,1849-1911. Stanford:Stanford University Press.

Watt,Ian. 1962. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe,Richardson,and Fielding. Berkeley:University of California Press.

Wills,Jr.,John E. 1979. “Maritime China from Wang Chih to Shih Lang:Themes in Peripheral History” Eds. J. D. Spence and J. E. Willis,Jr.. From Ming to Ching:Conquest,Region and Continuity in Seventeenth Century China. New Haven:Yale University Press. 203-238.

Wong,R. Bin. 2002. “The Search for European Differences and Domination in the Early Modern World:A view from Asia.” American Historical Review 107(2):447-469.

王正华:《艺术史与文化史的交界:关于视觉文化研究》,《近代中国史研究通讯》32,2001。

吴琼:《视觉性与视觉文化——视觉文化研究的谱系》,收录于吴琼编,《视觉文化的奇观——视觉文化总论》,中国人民大学出版社,2005。

叶启政:《观念巴贝塔:当代社会学的迷思》,群学出版社,2005。

新兴文化研究中心:《国立交通大学“新兴文化研究中心”文化研究国际营》(NSC International Institute of Cultural Studies),《中外文学》2002年第12期。

刘纪蕙:《文化研究的视觉系统》,《中外文学》2002年第12期。

刘纪蕙:《可见性问题与视觉政权》,收录于刘纪蕙主编《文化的视觉系统I》,麦田出版社,2006。

Babbie,Earl著《社会研究法》,邱泽奇译,华夏出版社,2005。

Bal,Mieke著《视觉本质主义与视觉文化的对象》,吴琼译,收录于吴琼编《视觉文化的奇观——视觉文化的总论》,中国人民大学出版社,2005。

Bann,Stephen著《新艺术史有多革命性?》,常宁生译,收录于常宁生编《艺术史的终结——当代西方艺术史哲学文选》,中国人民大学出版社,2004。

Comte,Auguste著《论实证精神》(Discours sur L’esprit Positif),黄建华译,商务印书馆,1996。

Coser,Lewis著《曼海姆思想评介》,张明贵译,收录于曼海姆著《知识社会学导论》(Ideology and Utopia:An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge),风云论坛出版社,1998。

Descartes,René著《我思故我在》,钱志纯编译,志文出版社,1991。

Durkheim,Emile著《宗教生活的基本形式》(The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life),芮传明、赵学元译,桂冠出版社,1992。

Durkheim,Emile著《社会学研究方法论》(The Rules of Sociological Method),黄丘隆译,结构群出版社,1990。

Geertz,Clifford著《文化的解释》(The Interpretation of Cultures),韩莉译,译林出版社,1999。

Jameson,Fredric著《后现代主义或晚期资本主义的文化逻辑》(Postmodernism,or,The cultural logic of late capitalism),吴美真译,时报文化出版社,1998。

Jameson,Fredric著《后现代主义与文化理论》唐小兵译,合志出版社,1990。

Levi-Strauss,Claude著《结构人类学》,谢维扬、俞宣孟译,上海译文出版社,1995。

Mannheim,Karl著《知识社会学导论》(Ideology and Utopia:An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge),张明贵译,风云论坛出版社,1998。

Marx,Karl著《1844年经济学哲学手稿》(Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts),伊海宇译,时报文化出版社,1993。

McLuhan,Marshall著《机器新娘——工业人的民俗》(The Mechanical Bride – Folklore of Industrial Man),何道宽译,中国人民大学出版社,2004。

Mirzoeff,Nicholas著《视觉文化导论》(An Introduction to Visual Culture),陈芸芸译,韦伯文化出版社,2004。

Overy,Paul著《新艺术史与艺术批评》,常宁生译,收录于常宁生编《艺术史的终结——当代西方艺术史哲学文选》,中国人民大学出版社,2004。

Plato著《柏拉图文艺对话录》,朱光潜译,网络与书出版社,2005。

Saussure,Ferdinand著《符号与语言》,陈志清译,收录于吴潜诚总编校《文化与社会》,立绪出版社,1997。

Simmel,Georg著《桥与门——齐美尔随笔集》(Das Individuum und die Freiheit Essai)涯鸿、宇声等译,新华书店,1991。

Simmel,Georg著《社会学——关于社会化形式的研究》(Soziologie),林荣远译,华夏出版社,2004。

Weber,Max著《社会学的基本概念》(Soziologische Grundbegriffe),顾忠华译,远流出版社,1997。

Jay,Martin,1992,“Scopic Regimes of Modernity.” pp.66-69 inThe Visual Culture Reader,edited by Nicholas Mirzoeff. London & New York:Routledge.

Barthes,Roland,1977,“Rhetoric of the Image.” pp.32-51 inImage,Music,Text,edited by Stephen Heath.New York:Noonday Press.

Berger,John,1972,Ways of Seeing. London:BBC Publications.

Bourdieu,Pierre,1984,Distinction – A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London:Routledge.

Bourdieu,Pierre,1990,“Artistic Taste and Cultural Capital.” pp.205-215 inCulture and Society – Contemporary Debates,edited by Jefrey C. Alexander and Steven Seidman. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu,Pierre,1993,The Field of Cultural Production:Essays on Art and Literature.Cambridge:Polity.

Current Sociology,1986,“Preface,” Current Sociology 34(3).

Elkins,James,2003,Visual Studies – A Skeptical Introduction. New York & London:Routledge.

Habermas,Jurgen,Jeremy J. Shapiro trans.,1972,Knowledge and Human Interests London :Heinemann Educational.

Henny,Leonard M.,1986,“Theory and Practice of Visual Sociology.” Current Sociology 34:1-76.

Hooper-Greenhill,Eilean,2000,Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. London & New York:Routledge.

Jenks,Chris,1995,“The Centrality of the Eye in Western Culture.” pp.1-25 inVisual Culture,edited by Chris Jenks. London:Routledge.

Jonas,Hans,1953/1954,“The Nobility of Sight – A Study in the Phenomenology of the Senses.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14:507-519.

Mannheim,Karl,1971,From Karl Mannheim,edited by Kurt H. Wolff. New York:Oxford University Press.

Merton,Robert King,1968,Social Theory and Social Structure. New York:Free Press.

Mitchell,W. J. T.,1994,Picture Theory. Chicago & London:University of Chicago Press.

October(Editors),1996,“Visual Culture Questionnaire.” October 77:25-70.

Panofsky,Erwin,1972,Studies in Iconology – Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. New York & London:Harper & Row,Publishers.

Papademas,Dians,1993,Visual Sociology and Using Film/Video in Sociology Courses,ed. Washington:American Sociological Association.

Rees,A. L. and Frances Borzello eds.,1986,The New Art History. London:Camden Press.

Tanner,Jeremy,2003,“Introduction:Sociology and Art History.” pp.1-26 inThe Sociology of Art – A Reader,edited by Jeremy Tanner. London:Routledge.

Tomaselli,Keyan G..,1999,Appropriating Images – The Semiotics of Visual Representation. Denmark:Intervention Press.

Walker,John A. & Sarah Chaplin,1997,Visual Culture – An Introduction. Manchester and New York:Manchester University Press.